* [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative
2024-08-02 0:22 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.12 Paul E. McKenney
@ 2024-08-02 0:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2024-08-02 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks, Puranjay Mohan,
Paul E . McKenney, Daniel Lustig, Joel Fernandes
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Pull-849[1] added the support of '&', '|', and '^' to the herd7 tool's
atomics operations.
Use these in linux-kernel.def to implement atomic_and()/or()/xor() with
all their ordering variants.
atomic_add_negative() is already available so add its acquire, release,
and relaxed ordering variants.
[1] https://github.com/herd/herdtools7/pull/849
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
---
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
index 88a39601f5256..d1f11930ec512 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ atomic_set_release(X,V) { smp_store_release(X,V); }
atomic_add(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,+,V); }
atomic_sub(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,-,V); }
+atomic_and(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,&,V); }
+atomic_or(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,|,V); }
+atomic_xor(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,^,V); }
atomic_inc(X) { __atomic_op(X,+,1); }
atomic_dec(X) { __atomic_op(X,-,1); }
@@ -77,6 +80,21 @@ atomic_fetch_add_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,+,V)
atomic_fetch_add_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,+,V)
atomic_fetch_add_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,+,V)
+atomic_fetch_and(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,&,V)
+
+atomic_fetch_or(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,|,V)
+
+atomic_fetch_xor(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,^,V)
+
atomic_inc_return(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,1)
atomic_inc_return_relaxed(X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,1)
atomic_inc_return_acquire(X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,1)
@@ -117,3 +135,6 @@ atomic_sub_and_test(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,V) == 0
atomic_dec_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,1) == 0
atomic_inc_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,1) == 0
atomic_add_negative(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,+,V) < 0
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15
@ 2025-02-20 16:13 Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative Paul E. McKenney
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-20 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks
Hello!
This series celebrates the release of version 7.58 of herd7, which
permits these commits to head to mainline:
1. Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative, courtesy of
Puranjay Mohan.
2. Add atomic_andnot() with its variants, courtesy of Puranjay Mohan.
3. Legitimize current use of tags in LKMM macros, courtesy of
Jonas Oberhauser.
4. Define applicable tags on operation in tools/..., courtesy of
Jonas Oberhauser.
5. Define effect of Mb tags on RMWs in tools/..., courtesy of
Jonas Oberhauser.
6. Switch to softcoded herd7 tags, courtesy of Jonas Oberhauser.
7. Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags, courtesy of
Jonas Oberhauser.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 27 -
b/tools/memory-model/README | 2
b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 9
b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat | 10
b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg | 1
b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 21 +
tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 44 +-
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 36 +-
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 222 ++++++-------
9 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-20 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 2/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_andnot() with its variants Paul E. McKenney
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-20 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks, Puranjay Mohan,
Paul E . McKenney, Daniel Lustig, Joel Fernandes
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Pull-849[1] added the support of '&', '|', and '^' to the herd7 tool's
atomics operations.
Use these in linux-kernel.def to implement atomic_and()/or()/xor() with
all their ordering variants.
atomic_add_negative() is already available so add its acquire, release,
and relaxed ordering variants.
[1] https://github.com/herd/herdtools7/pull/849
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
---
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
index 88a39601f5256..d1f11930ec512 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ atomic_set_release(X,V) { smp_store_release(X,V); }
atomic_add(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,+,V); }
atomic_sub(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,-,V); }
+atomic_and(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,&,V); }
+atomic_or(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,|,V); }
+atomic_xor(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,^,V); }
atomic_inc(X) { __atomic_op(X,+,1); }
atomic_dec(X) { __atomic_op(X,-,1); }
@@ -77,6 +80,21 @@ atomic_fetch_add_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,+,V)
atomic_fetch_add_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,+,V)
atomic_fetch_add_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,+,V)
+atomic_fetch_and(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,&,V)
+
+atomic_fetch_or(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,|,V)
+
+atomic_fetch_xor(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,^,V)
+
atomic_inc_return(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,1)
atomic_inc_return_relaxed(X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,1)
atomic_inc_return_acquire(X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,1)
@@ -117,3 +135,6 @@ atomic_sub_and_test(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,V) == 0
atomic_dec_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,1) == 0
atomic_inc_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,1) == 0
atomic_add_negative(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,+,V) < 0
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH memory-model 2/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_andnot() with its variants
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-20 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 3/7] tools/memory-model: Legitimize current use of tags in LKMM macros Paul E. McKenney
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-20 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks, Puranjay Mohan,
Paul E . McKenney, Daniel Lustig, Joel Fernandes
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Pull-855[1] added the support of atomic_andnot() to the herd tool. Use
this to add the implementation in the LKMM. All of the ordering variants
are also added.
Here is a small litmus-test that uses this operation:
C andnot
{
atomic_t u = ATOMIC_INIT(7);
}
P0(atomic_t *u)
{
r0 = atomic_fetch_andnot(3, u);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*u);
}
exists (0:r0=7 /\ 0:r1=4)
Test andnot Allowed
States 1
0:r0=7; 0:r1=4;
Ok
Witnesses
Positive: 1 Negative: 0
Condition exists (0:r0=7 /\ 0:r1=4)
Observation andnot Always 1 0
Time andnot 0.00
Hash=78f011a0b5a0c65fa1cf106fcd62c845
[1] https://github.com/herd/herdtools7/pull/855
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
---
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
index d1f11930ec512..a12b96c547b7a 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ atomic_or(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,|,V); }
atomic_xor(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,^,V); }
atomic_inc(X) { __atomic_op(X,+,1); }
atomic_dec(X) { __atomic_op(X,-,1); }
+atomic_andnot(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,&~,V); }
atomic_add_return(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V)
atomic_add_return_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,V)
@@ -138,3 +139,8 @@ atomic_add_negative(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V) < 0
atomic_add_negative_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,V) < 0
atomic_add_negative_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,V) < 0
atomic_add_negative_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,+,V) < 0
+
+atomic_fetch_andnot(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,&~,V)
+atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,&~,V)
+atomic_fetch_andnot_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,&~,V)
+atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,&~,V)
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH memory-model 3/7] tools/memory-model: Legitimize current use of tags in LKMM macros
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 2/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_andnot() with its variants Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-20 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 4/7] tools/memory-model: Define applicable tags on operation in tools/ Paul E. McKenney
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-20 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks, Jonas Oberhauser,
Paul E . McKenney
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
The current macros in linux-kernel.def reference instructions such as
__xchg{mb} or __cmpxchg{acquire}, which are invalid combinations of tags
and instructions according to the declarations in linux-kernel.bell.
This works with current herd7 because herd7 removes these tags anyways
and does not actually enforce validity of combinations at all.
If a future herd7 version no longer applies these hardcoded
transformations, then all currently invalid combinations will actually
appear on some instruction.
We therefore adjust the declarations to make the resulting combinations
valid, by adding the 'mb tag to the set of Accesses and allowing all
Accesses to appear on all read, write, and RMW instructions.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
index ce068700939c5..dba6b5b6dee01 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
@@ -16,10 +16,11 @@
enum Accesses = 'once (*READ_ONCE,WRITE_ONCE*) ||
'release (*smp_store_release*) ||
'acquire (*smp_load_acquire*) ||
- 'noreturn (* R of non-return RMW *)
-instructions R[{'once,'acquire,'noreturn}]
-instructions W[{'once,'release}]
-instructions RMW[{'once,'acquire,'release}]
+ 'noreturn (* R of non-return RMW *) ||
+ 'mb (*xchg(),cmpxchg(),...*)
+instructions R[Accesses]
+instructions W[Accesses]
+instructions RMW[Accesses]
enum Barriers = 'wmb (*smp_wmb*) ||
'rmb (*smp_rmb*) ||
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH memory-model 4/7] tools/memory-model: Define applicable tags on operation in tools/...
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 3/7] tools/memory-model: Legitimize current use of tags in LKMM macros Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-20 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 5/7] tools/memory-model: Define effect of Mb tags on RMWs " Paul E. McKenney
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-20 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks, Jonas Oberhauser,
Paul E . McKenney
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Herd7 transforms reads, writes, and read-modify-writes by eliminating
'acquire tags from writes, 'release tags from reads, and 'acquire,
'release, and 'mb tags from failed read-modify-writes. We emulate this
behavior by redefining Acquire, Release, and Mb sets in linux-kernel.bell
to explicitly exclude those combinations.
Herd7 furthermore adds 'noreturn tag to certain reads. Currently herd7
does not allow specifying the 'noreturn tag manually, but such manual
declaration (e.g., through a syntax __atomic_op{noreturn}) would add
invalid 'noreturn tags to writes; in preparation, we already also exclude
this combination.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
index dba6b5b6dee01..7c9ae48b94377 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
@@ -36,6 +36,17 @@ enum Barriers = 'wmb (*smp_wmb*) ||
'after-srcu-read-unlock (*smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock*)
instructions F[Barriers]
+
+(*
+ * Filter out syntactic annotations that do not provide the corresponding
+ * semantic ordering, such as Acquire on a store or Mb on a failed RMW.
+ *)
+let FailedRMW = RMW \ (domain(rmw) | range(rmw))
+let Acquire = Acquire \ W \ FailedRMW
+let Release = Release \ R \ FailedRMW
+let Mb = Mb \ FailedRMW
+let Noreturn = Noreturn \ W
+
(* SRCU *)
enum SRCU = 'srcu-lock || 'srcu-unlock || 'sync-srcu
instructions SRCU[SRCU]
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH memory-model 5/7] tools/memory-model: Define effect of Mb tags on RMWs in tools/...
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 4/7] tools/memory-model: Define applicable tags on operation in tools/ Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-20 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags Paul E. McKenney
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-20 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks, Jonas Oberhauser,
Viktor Vafeiadis, Paul E . McKenney
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Herd7 transforms successful RMW with Mb tags by inserting smp_mb() fences
around them. We emulate this by considering imaginary po-edges before the
RMW read and before the RMW write, and extending the smp_mb() ordering
rule, which currently only applies to real po edges that would be found
around a really inserted smp_mb(), also to cases of the only imagined po
edges.
Reported-by: Viktor Vafeiadis <viktor@mpi-sws.org>
Suggested-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
index adf3c4f412296..d7e7bf13c831b 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
@@ -34,6 +34,16 @@ let R4rmb = R \ Noreturn (* Reads for which rmb works *)
let rmb = [R4rmb] ; fencerel(Rmb) ; [R4rmb]
let wmb = [W] ; fencerel(Wmb) ; [W]
let mb = ([M] ; fencerel(Mb) ; [M]) |
+ (*
+ * full-barrier RMWs (successful cmpxchg(), xchg(), etc.) act as
+ * though there were enclosed by smp_mb().
+ * The effect of these virtual smp_mb() is formalized by adding
+ * Mb tags to the read and write of the operation, and providing
+ * the same ordering as though there were additional po edges
+ * between the Mb tag and the read resp. write.
+ *)
+ ([M] ; po ; [Mb & R]) |
+ ([Mb & W] ; po ; [M]) |
([M] ; fencerel(Before-atomic) ; [RMW] ; po? ; [M]) |
([M] ; po? ; [RMW] ; fencerel(After-atomic) ; [M]) |
([M] ; po? ; [LKW] ; fencerel(After-spinlock) ; [M]) |
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 5/7] tools/memory-model: Define effect of Mb tags on RMWs " Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-20 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-25 4:24 ` Akira Yokosawa
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags Paul E. McKenney
6 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-20 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks, Jonas Oberhauser,
Hernan Ponce de Leon, Paul E . McKenney
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
A new version of herd7 provides a -lkmmv2 switch which overrides the old herd7
behavior of simply ignoring any softcoded tags in the .def and .bell files. We
port LKMM to this version of herd7 by providing the switch in linux-kernel.cfg
and reporting an error if the LKMM is used without this switch.
To preserve the semantics of LKMM, we also softcode the Noreturn tag on atomic
RMW which do not return a value and define atomic_add_unless with an Mb tag in
linux-kernel.def.
We update the herd-representation.txt accordingly and clarify some of the
resulting combinations.
Signed-off-by: Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
.../Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 27 ++++++++++---------
tools/memory-model/README | 2 +-
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 3 +++
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg | 1 +
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 18 +++++++------
5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt
index ed988906f2b71..7ae1ff3d3769e 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
#
# By convention, a blank line in a cell means "same as the preceding line".
#
+# Note that the syntactic representation does not always match the sets and
+# relations in linux-kernel.cat, due to redefinitions in linux-kernel.bell and
+# lock.cat. For example, the po link between LKR and LKW is upgraded to an rmw
+# link, and W[acquire] are not included in the Acquire set.
+#
# Disclaimer. The table includes representations of "add" and "and" operations;
# corresponding/identical representations of "sub", "inc", "dec" and "or", "xor",
# "andnot" operations are omitted.
@@ -60,14 +65,13 @@
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| RMW ops w/o return value | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[once] |
+ | atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[noreturn] |
| atomic_and | |
| spin_lock | LKR ->po LKW |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| RMW ops w/ return value | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | atomic_add_return | F[mb] ->po R*[once] |
- | | ->rmw W*[once] ->po F[mb] |
+ | atomic_add_return | R*[mb] ->rmw W*[mb] |
| atomic_fetch_add | |
| atomic_fetch_and | |
| atomic_xchg | |
@@ -79,13 +83,13 @@
| atomic_xchg_relaxed | |
| xchg_relaxed | |
| atomic_add_negative_relaxed | |
- | atomic_add_return_acquire | R*[acquire] ->rmw W*[once] |
+ | atomic_add_return_acquire | R*[acquire] ->rmw W*[acquire] |
| atomic_fetch_add_acquire | |
| atomic_fetch_and_acquire | |
| atomic_xchg_acquire | |
| xchg_acquire | |
| atomic_add_negative_acquire | |
- | atomic_add_return_release | R*[once] ->rmw W*[release] |
+ | atomic_add_return_release | R*[release] ->rmw W*[release] |
| atomic_fetch_add_release | |
| atomic_fetch_and_release | |
| atomic_xchg_release | |
@@ -94,17 +98,16 @@
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Conditional RMW ops | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | atomic_cmpxchg | On success: F[mb] ->po R*[once] |
- | | ->rmw W*[once] ->po F[mb] |
- | | On failure: R*[once] |
+ | atomic_cmpxchg | On success: R*[mb] ->rmw W*[mb] |
+ | | On failure: R*[mb] |
| cmpxchg | |
| atomic_add_unless | |
| atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed | On success: R*[once] ->rmw W*[once] |
| | On failure: R*[once] |
- | atomic_cmpxchg_acquire | On success: R*[acquire] ->rmw W*[once] |
- | | On failure: R*[once] |
- | atomic_cmpxchg_release | On success: R*[once] ->rmw W*[release] |
- | | On failure: R*[once] |
+ | atomic_cmpxchg_acquire | On success: R*[acquire] ->rmw W*[acquire] |
+ | | On failure: R*[acquire] |
+ | atomic_cmpxchg_release | On success: R*[release] ->rmw W*[release] |
+ | | On failure: R*[release] |
| spin_trylock | On success: LKR ->po LKW |
| | On failure: LF |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/README b/tools/memory-model/README
index dab38904206a0..59bc15edeb8ab 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/README
+++ b/tools/memory-model/README
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ that litmus test to be exercised within the Linux kernel.
REQUIREMENTS
============
-Version 7.52 or higher of the "herd7" and "klitmus7" tools must be
+Version 7.58 or higher of the "herd7" and "klitmus7" tools must be
downloaded separately:
https://github.com/herd/herdtools7
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
index 7c9ae48b94377..8ae47545df978 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
@@ -94,3 +94,6 @@ let carry-dep = (data ; [~ Srcu-unlock] ; rfi)*
let addr = carry-dep ; addr
let ctrl = carry-dep ; ctrl
let data = carry-dep ; data
+
+flag ~empty (if "lkmmv2" then 0 else _)
+ as this-model-requires-variant-higher-than-lkmmv1
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg
index 3c8098e99f41d..69b04f3aad737 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
macros linux-kernel.def
bell linux-kernel.bell
model linux-kernel.cat
+variant lkmmv2
graph columns
squished true
showevents noregs
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
index a12b96c547b7a..d7279a357cba0 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
@@ -63,14 +63,14 @@ atomic_set(X,V) { WRITE_ONCE(*X,V); }
atomic_read_acquire(X) smp_load_acquire(X)
atomic_set_release(X,V) { smp_store_release(X,V); }
-atomic_add(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,+,V); }
-atomic_sub(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,-,V); }
-atomic_and(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,&,V); }
-atomic_or(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,|,V); }
-atomic_xor(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,^,V); }
-atomic_inc(X) { __atomic_op(X,+,1); }
-atomic_dec(X) { __atomic_op(X,-,1); }
-atomic_andnot(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,&~,V); }
+atomic_add(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,+,V); }
+atomic_sub(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,-,V); }
+atomic_and(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,&,V); }
+atomic_or(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,|,V); }
+atomic_xor(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,^,V); }
+atomic_inc(X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,+,1); }
+atomic_dec(X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,-,1); }
+atomic_andnot(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,&~,V); }
atomic_add_return(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V)
atomic_add_return_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,V)
@@ -144,3 +144,5 @@ atomic_fetch_andnot(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,&~,V)
atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,&~,V)
atomic_fetch_andnot_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,&~,V)
atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,&~,V)
+
+atomic_add_unless(X,V,W) __atomic_add_unless{mb}(X,V,W)
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-20 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-25 4:28 ` Akira Yokosawa
6 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-20 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks, Jonas Oberhauser,
Paul E . McKenney
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic tags
would imply. For example, an 'acquire tag on a write does not imply that
the write is finally in the Acquire set and provides acquire ordering.
To distinguish in those cases between the syntactic tags and actual
sets, we capitalize the former, so 'ACQUIRE tags may be present on both
reads and writes, but only reads will appear in the Acquire set.
For tags where the two concepts are the same we do not use specific
capitalization to make this distinction.
Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
.../Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 44 ++--
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 22 +-
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 198 +++++++++---------
3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt
index 7ae1ff3d3769e..4e19b4f2a476e 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/herd-representation.txt
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
# Note that the syntactic representation does not always match the sets and
# relations in linux-kernel.cat, due to redefinitions in linux-kernel.bell and
# lock.cat. For example, the po link between LKR and LKW is upgraded to an rmw
-# link, and W[acquire] are not included in the Acquire set.
+# link, and W[ACQUIRE] are not included in the Acquire set.
#
# Disclaimer. The table includes representations of "add" and "and" operations;
# corresponding/identical representations of "sub", "inc", "dec" and "or", "xor",
@@ -32,16 +32,16 @@
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Non-RMW ops | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | READ_ONCE | R[once] |
+ | READ_ONCE | R[ONCE] |
| atomic_read | |
- | WRITE_ONCE | W[once] |
+ | WRITE_ONCE | W[ONCE] |
| atomic_set | |
- | smp_load_acquire | R[acquire] |
+ | smp_load_acquire | R[ACQUIRE] |
| atomic_read_acquire | |
- | smp_store_release | W[release] |
+ | smp_store_release | W[RELEASE] |
| atomic_set_release | |
- | smp_store_mb | W[once] ->po F[mb] |
- | smp_mb | F[mb] |
+ | smp_store_mb | W[ONCE] ->po F[MB] |
+ | smp_mb | F[MB] |
| smp_rmb | F[rmb] |
| smp_wmb | F[wmb] |
| smp_mb__before_atomic | F[before-atomic] |
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@
| rcu_read_lock | F[rcu-lock] |
| rcu_read_unlock | F[rcu-unlock] |
| synchronize_rcu | F[sync-rcu] |
- | rcu_dereference | R[once] |
- | rcu_assign_pointer | W[release] |
+ | rcu_dereference | R[ONCE] |
+ | rcu_assign_pointer | W[RELEASE] |
| srcu_read_lock | R[srcu-lock] |
| srcu_down_read | |
| srcu_read_unlock | W[srcu-unlock] |
@@ -65,31 +65,31 @@
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| RMW ops w/o return value | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[noreturn] |
+ | atomic_add | R*[NORETURN] ->rmw W*[NORETURN] |
| atomic_and | |
| spin_lock | LKR ->po LKW |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| RMW ops w/ return value | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | atomic_add_return | R*[mb] ->rmw W*[mb] |
+ | atomic_add_return | R*[MB] ->rmw W*[MB] |
| atomic_fetch_add | |
| atomic_fetch_and | |
| atomic_xchg | |
| xchg | |
| atomic_add_negative | |
- | atomic_add_return_relaxed | R*[once] ->rmw W*[once] |
+ | atomic_add_return_relaxed | R*[ONCE] ->rmw W*[ONCE] |
| atomic_fetch_add_relaxed | |
| atomic_fetch_and_relaxed | |
| atomic_xchg_relaxed | |
| xchg_relaxed | |
| atomic_add_negative_relaxed | |
- | atomic_add_return_acquire | R*[acquire] ->rmw W*[acquire] |
+ | atomic_add_return_acquire | R*[ACQUIRE] ->rmw W*[ACQUIRE] |
| atomic_fetch_add_acquire | |
| atomic_fetch_and_acquire | |
| atomic_xchg_acquire | |
| xchg_acquire | |
| atomic_add_negative_acquire | |
- | atomic_add_return_release | R*[release] ->rmw W*[release] |
+ | atomic_add_return_release | R*[RELEASE] ->rmw W*[RELEASE] |
| atomic_fetch_add_release | |
| atomic_fetch_and_release | |
| atomic_xchg_release | |
@@ -98,16 +98,16 @@
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Conditional RMW ops | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | atomic_cmpxchg | On success: R*[mb] ->rmw W*[mb] |
- | | On failure: R*[mb] |
+ | atomic_cmpxchg | On success: R*[MB] ->rmw W*[MB] |
+ | | On failure: R*[MB] |
| cmpxchg | |
| atomic_add_unless | |
- | atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed | On success: R*[once] ->rmw W*[once] |
- | | On failure: R*[once] |
- | atomic_cmpxchg_acquire | On success: R*[acquire] ->rmw W*[acquire] |
- | | On failure: R*[acquire] |
- | atomic_cmpxchg_release | On success: R*[release] ->rmw W*[release] |
- | | On failure: R*[release] |
+ | atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed | On success: R*[ONCE] ->rmw W*[ONCE] |
+ | | On failure: R*[ONCE] |
+ | atomic_cmpxchg_acquire | On success: R*[ACQUIRE] ->rmw W*[ACQUIRE] |
+ | | On failure: R*[ACQUIRE] |
+ | atomic_cmpxchg_release | On success: R*[RELEASE] ->rmw W*[RELEASE] |
+ | | On failure: R*[RELEASE] |
| spin_trylock | On success: LKR ->po LKW |
| | On failure: LF |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
index 8ae47545df978..fe65998002b99 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
@@ -13,18 +13,18 @@
"Linux-kernel memory consistency model"
-enum Accesses = 'once (*READ_ONCE,WRITE_ONCE*) ||
- 'release (*smp_store_release*) ||
- 'acquire (*smp_load_acquire*) ||
- 'noreturn (* R of non-return RMW *) ||
- 'mb (*xchg(),cmpxchg(),...*)
+enum Accesses = 'ONCE (*READ_ONCE,WRITE_ONCE*) ||
+ 'RELEASE (*smp_store_release*) ||
+ 'ACQUIRE (*smp_load_acquire*) ||
+ 'NORETURN (* R of non-return RMW *) ||
+ 'MB (*xchg(),cmpxchg(),...*)
instructions R[Accesses]
instructions W[Accesses]
instructions RMW[Accesses]
enum Barriers = 'wmb (*smp_wmb*) ||
'rmb (*smp_rmb*) ||
- 'mb (*smp_mb*) ||
+ 'MB (*smp_mb*) ||
'barrier (*barrier*) ||
'rcu-lock (*rcu_read_lock*) ||
'rcu-unlock (*rcu_read_unlock*) ||
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ instructions F[Barriers]
* semantic ordering, such as Acquire on a store or Mb on a failed RMW.
*)
let FailedRMW = RMW \ (domain(rmw) | range(rmw))
-let Acquire = Acquire \ W \ FailedRMW
-let Release = Release \ R \ FailedRMW
-let Mb = Mb \ FailedRMW
-let Noreturn = Noreturn \ W
+let Acquire = ACQUIRE \ W \ FailedRMW
+let Release = RELEASE \ R \ FailedRMW
+let Mb = MB \ FailedRMW
+let Noreturn = NORETURN \ W
(* SRCU *)
enum SRCU = 'srcu-lock || 'srcu-unlock || 'sync-srcu
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ flag ~empty rcu-rscs & (po ; [Sync-srcu] ; po) as invalid-sleep
flag ~empty different-values(srcu-rscs) as srcu-bad-value-match
(* Compute marked and plain memory accesses *)
-let Marked = (~M) | IW | Once | Release | Acquire | domain(rmw) | range(rmw) |
+let Marked = (~M) | IW | ONCE | RELEASE | ACQUIRE | MB | RMW |
LKR | LKW | UL | LF | RL | RU | Srcu-lock | Srcu-unlock
let Plain = M \ Marked
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
index d7279a357cba0..49e402782e49c 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
@@ -6,18 +6,18 @@
// which appeared in ASPLOS 2018.
// ONCE
-READ_ONCE(X) __load{once}(X)
-WRITE_ONCE(X,V) { __store{once}(X,V); }
+READ_ONCE(X) __load{ONCE}(X)
+WRITE_ONCE(X,V) { __store{ONCE}(X,V); }
// Release Acquire and friends
-smp_store_release(X,V) { __store{release}(*X,V); }
-smp_load_acquire(X) __load{acquire}(*X)
-rcu_assign_pointer(X,V) { __store{release}(X,V); }
-rcu_dereference(X) __load{once}(X)
-smp_store_mb(X,V) { __store{once}(X,V); __fence{mb}; }
+smp_store_release(X,V) { __store{RELEASE}(*X,V); }
+smp_load_acquire(X) __load{ACQUIRE}(*X)
+rcu_assign_pointer(X,V) { __store{RELEASE}(X,V); }
+rcu_dereference(X) __load{ONCE}(X)
+smp_store_mb(X,V) { __store{ONCE}(X,V); __fence{MB}; }
// Fences
-smp_mb() { __fence{mb}; }
+smp_mb() { __fence{MB}; }
smp_rmb() { __fence{rmb}; }
smp_wmb() { __fence{wmb}; }
smp_mb__before_atomic() { __fence{before-atomic}; }
@@ -28,14 +28,14 @@ smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock() { __fence{after-srcu-read-unlock}; }
barrier() { __fence{barrier}; }
// Exchange
-xchg(X,V) __xchg{mb}(X,V)
-xchg_relaxed(X,V) __xchg{once}(X,V)
-xchg_release(X,V) __xchg{release}(X,V)
-xchg_acquire(X,V) __xchg{acquire}(X,V)
-cmpxchg(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{mb}(X,V,W)
-cmpxchg_relaxed(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{once}(X,V,W)
-cmpxchg_acquire(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{acquire}(X,V,W)
-cmpxchg_release(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{release}(X,V,W)
+xchg(X,V) __xchg{MB}(X,V)
+xchg_relaxed(X,V) __xchg{ONCE}(X,V)
+xchg_release(X,V) __xchg{RELEASE}(X,V)
+xchg_acquire(X,V) __xchg{ACQUIRE}(X,V)
+cmpxchg(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{MB}(X,V,W)
+cmpxchg_relaxed(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{ONCE}(X,V,W)
+cmpxchg_acquire(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{ACQUIRE}(X,V,W)
+cmpxchg_release(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{RELEASE}(X,V,W)
// Spinlocks
spin_lock(X) { __lock(X); }
@@ -63,86 +63,86 @@ atomic_set(X,V) { WRITE_ONCE(*X,V); }
atomic_read_acquire(X) smp_load_acquire(X)
atomic_set_release(X,V) { smp_store_release(X,V); }
-atomic_add(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,+,V); }
-atomic_sub(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,-,V); }
-atomic_and(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,&,V); }
-atomic_or(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,|,V); }
-atomic_xor(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,^,V); }
-atomic_inc(X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,+,1); }
-atomic_dec(X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,-,1); }
-atomic_andnot(V,X) { __atomic_op{noreturn}(X,&~,V); }
-
-atomic_add_return(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V)
-atomic_add_return_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,V)
-atomic_add_return_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,V)
-atomic_add_return_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,+,V)
-atomic_fetch_add(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,+,V)
-atomic_fetch_add_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,+,V)
-atomic_fetch_add_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,+,V)
-atomic_fetch_add_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,+,V)
-
-atomic_fetch_and(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,&,V)
-atomic_fetch_and_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,&,V)
-atomic_fetch_and_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,&,V)
-atomic_fetch_and_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,&,V)
-
-atomic_fetch_or(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,|,V)
-atomic_fetch_or_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,|,V)
-atomic_fetch_or_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,|,V)
-atomic_fetch_or_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,|,V)
-
-atomic_fetch_xor(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,^,V)
-atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,^,V)
-atomic_fetch_xor_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,^,V)
-atomic_fetch_xor_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,^,V)
-
-atomic_inc_return(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,1)
-atomic_inc_return_relaxed(X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,1)
-atomic_inc_return_acquire(X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,1)
-atomic_inc_return_release(X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,+,1)
-atomic_fetch_inc(X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,+,1)
-atomic_fetch_inc_relaxed(X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,+,1)
-atomic_fetch_inc_acquire(X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,+,1)
-atomic_fetch_inc_release(X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,+,1)
-
-atomic_sub_return(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,V)
-atomic_sub_return_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,-,V)
-atomic_sub_return_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,-,V)
-atomic_sub_return_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,-,V)
-atomic_fetch_sub(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,-,V)
-atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,-,V)
-atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,-,V)
-atomic_fetch_sub_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,-,V)
-
-atomic_dec_return(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,1)
-atomic_dec_return_relaxed(X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,-,1)
-atomic_dec_return_acquire(X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,-,1)
-atomic_dec_return_release(X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,-,1)
-atomic_fetch_dec(X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,-,1)
-atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,-,1)
-atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,-,1)
-atomic_fetch_dec_release(X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,-,1)
-
-atomic_xchg(X,V) __xchg{mb}(X,V)
-atomic_xchg_relaxed(X,V) __xchg{once}(X,V)
-atomic_xchg_release(X,V) __xchg{release}(X,V)
-atomic_xchg_acquire(X,V) __xchg{acquire}(X,V)
-atomic_cmpxchg(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{mb}(X,V,W)
-atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{once}(X,V,W)
-atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{acquire}(X,V,W)
-atomic_cmpxchg_release(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{release}(X,V,W)
-
-atomic_sub_and_test(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,V) == 0
-atomic_dec_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,1) == 0
-atomic_inc_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,1) == 0
-atomic_add_negative(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V) < 0
-atomic_add_negative_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,V) < 0
-atomic_add_negative_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,V) < 0
-atomic_add_negative_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,+,V) < 0
-
-atomic_fetch_andnot(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,&~,V)
-atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,&~,V)
-atomic_fetch_andnot_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,&~,V)
-atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,&~,V)
-
-atomic_add_unless(X,V,W) __atomic_add_unless{mb}(X,V,W)
+atomic_add(V,X) { __atomic_op{NORETURN}(X,+,V); }
+atomic_sub(V,X) { __atomic_op{NORETURN}(X,-,V); }
+atomic_and(V,X) { __atomic_op{NORETURN}(X,&,V); }
+atomic_or(V,X) { __atomic_op{NORETURN}(X,|,V); }
+atomic_xor(V,X) { __atomic_op{NORETURN}(X,^,V); }
+atomic_inc(X) { __atomic_op{NORETURN}(X,+,1); }
+atomic_dec(X) { __atomic_op{NORETURN}(X,-,1); }
+atomic_andnot(V,X) { __atomic_op{NORETURN}(X,&~,V); }
+
+atomic_add_return(V,X) __atomic_op_return{MB}(X,+,V)
+atomic_add_return_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{ONCE}(X,+,V)
+atomic_add_return_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{ACQUIRE}(X,+,V)
+atomic_add_return_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{RELEASE}(X,+,V)
+atomic_fetch_add(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{MB}(X,+,V)
+atomic_fetch_add_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ONCE}(X,+,V)
+atomic_fetch_add_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ACQUIRE}(X,+,V)
+atomic_fetch_add_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{RELEASE}(X,+,V)
+
+atomic_fetch_and(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{MB}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ONCE}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ACQUIRE}(X,&,V)
+atomic_fetch_and_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{RELEASE}(X,&,V)
+
+atomic_fetch_or(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{MB}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ONCE}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ACQUIRE}(X,|,V)
+atomic_fetch_or_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{RELEASE}(X,|,V)
+
+atomic_fetch_xor(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{MB}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ONCE}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ACQUIRE}(X,^,V)
+atomic_fetch_xor_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{RELEASE}(X,^,V)
+
+atomic_inc_return(X) __atomic_op_return{MB}(X,+,1)
+atomic_inc_return_relaxed(X) __atomic_op_return{ONCE}(X,+,1)
+atomic_inc_return_acquire(X) __atomic_op_return{ACQUIRE}(X,+,1)
+atomic_inc_return_release(X) __atomic_op_return{RELEASE}(X,+,1)
+atomic_fetch_inc(X) __atomic_fetch_op{MB}(X,+,1)
+atomic_fetch_inc_relaxed(X) __atomic_fetch_op{ONCE}(X,+,1)
+atomic_fetch_inc_acquire(X) __atomic_fetch_op{ACQUIRE}(X,+,1)
+atomic_fetch_inc_release(X) __atomic_fetch_op{RELEASE}(X,+,1)
+
+atomic_sub_return(V,X) __atomic_op_return{MB}(X,-,V)
+atomic_sub_return_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{ONCE}(X,-,V)
+atomic_sub_return_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{ACQUIRE}(X,-,V)
+atomic_sub_return_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{RELEASE}(X,-,V)
+atomic_fetch_sub(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{MB}(X,-,V)
+atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ONCE}(X,-,V)
+atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ACQUIRE}(X,-,V)
+atomic_fetch_sub_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{RELEASE}(X,-,V)
+
+atomic_dec_return(X) __atomic_op_return{MB}(X,-,1)
+atomic_dec_return_relaxed(X) __atomic_op_return{ONCE}(X,-,1)
+atomic_dec_return_acquire(X) __atomic_op_return{ACQUIRE}(X,-,1)
+atomic_dec_return_release(X) __atomic_op_return{RELEASE}(X,-,1)
+atomic_fetch_dec(X) __atomic_fetch_op{MB}(X,-,1)
+atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(X) __atomic_fetch_op{ONCE}(X,-,1)
+atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(X) __atomic_fetch_op{ACQUIRE}(X,-,1)
+atomic_fetch_dec_release(X) __atomic_fetch_op{RELEASE}(X,-,1)
+
+atomic_xchg(X,V) __xchg{MB}(X,V)
+atomic_xchg_relaxed(X,V) __xchg{ONCE}(X,V)
+atomic_xchg_release(X,V) __xchg{RELEASE}(X,V)
+atomic_xchg_acquire(X,V) __xchg{ACQUIRE}(X,V)
+atomic_cmpxchg(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{MB}(X,V,W)
+atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{ONCE}(X,V,W)
+atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{ACQUIRE}(X,V,W)
+atomic_cmpxchg_release(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{RELEASE}(X,V,W)
+
+atomic_sub_and_test(V,X) __atomic_op_return{MB}(X,-,V) == 0
+atomic_dec_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{MB}(X,-,1) == 0
+atomic_inc_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{MB}(X,+,1) == 0
+atomic_add_negative(V,X) __atomic_op_return{MB}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{ONCE}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{ACQUIRE}(X,+,V) < 0
+atomic_add_negative_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{RELEASE}(X,+,V) < 0
+
+atomic_fetch_andnot(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{MB}(X,&~,V)
+atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ACQUIRE}(X,&~,V)
+atomic_fetch_andnot_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{RELEASE}(X,&~,V)
+atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{ONCE}(X,&~,V)
+
+atomic_add_unless(X,V,W) __atomic_add_unless{MB}(X,V,W)
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-25 4:24 ` Akira Yokosawa
2025-02-25 7:40 ` Hernan Ponce de Leon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Akira Yokosawa @ 2025-02-25 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team,
mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, Jonas Oberhauser, Hernan Ponce de Leon,
Akira Yokosawa
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:14:02 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
>
> A new version of herd7 provides a -lkmmv2 switch which overrides the old herd7
> behavior of simply ignoring any softcoded tags in the .def and .bell files. We
> port LKMM to this version of herd7 by providing the switch in linux-kernel.cfg
> and reporting an error if the LKMM is used without this switch.
>
> To preserve the semantics of LKMM, we also softcode the Noreturn tag on atomic
> RMW which do not return a value and define atomic_add_unless with an Mb tag in
> linux-kernel.def.
>
> We update the herd-representation.txt accordingly and clarify some of the
> resulting combinations.
>
Having failed to hear from Jonas or Hernan in response to my question at:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkmm/ec97f28e-31ad-4a45-ac87-fab91e27d4ee@gmail.com/
, let me guess. Past contributions strongly suggest that Hernan looks after
herd7 changes and Jonas takes care of LKMM side of changes.
So my suggestion is to add a Co-developed-by tag of Hernan here:
Co-developed-by: Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
, and let me add a Tested-by:
Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> # herdtools7.7.58
Thanks, Akira
> ---
> .../Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 27 ++++++++++---------
> tools/memory-model/README | 2 +-
> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 3 +++
> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg | 1 +
> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 18 +++++++------
> 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags Paul E. McKenney
@ 2025-02-25 4:28 ` Akira Yokosawa
2025-02-25 18:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Akira Yokosawa @ 2025-02-25 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team,
mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, Jonas Oberhauser, Akira Yokosawa
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:14:03 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
>
> Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic tags
> would imply. For example, an 'acquire tag on a write does not imply that
> the write is finally in the Acquire set and provides acquire ordering.
>
> To distinguish in those cases between the syntactic tags and actual
> sets, we capitalize the former, so 'ACQUIRE tags may be present on both
> reads and writes, but only reads will appear in the Acquire set.
>
> For tags where the two concepts are the same we do not use specific
> capitalization to make this distinction.
>
> Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> # herdtools7.7.58
> ---
> .../Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 44 ++--
> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 22 +-
> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 198 +++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags
2025-02-25 4:24 ` Akira Yokosawa
@ 2025-02-25 7:40 ` Hernan Ponce de Leon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Hernan Ponce de Leon @ 2025-02-25 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akira Yokosawa, Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm,
kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, Jonas Oberhauser
On 2/25/2025 5:24 AM, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:14:02 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
>>
>> A new version of herd7 provides a -lkmmv2 switch which overrides the old herd7
>> behavior of simply ignoring any softcoded tags in the .def and .bell files. We
>> port LKMM to this version of herd7 by providing the switch in linux-kernel.cfg
>> and reporting an error if the LKMM is used without this switch.
>>
>> To preserve the semantics of LKMM, we also softcode the Noreturn tag on atomic
>> RMW which do not return a value and define atomic_add_unless with an Mb tag in
>> linux-kernel.def.
>>
>> We update the herd-representation.txt accordingly and clarify some of the
>> resulting combinations.
>>
>
> Having failed to hear from Jonas or Hernan in response to my question at:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkmm/ec97f28e-31ad-4a45-ac87-fab91e27d4ee@gmail.com/
Sorry Akira, I lost track of the thread and forgot to answer.
>
> , let me guess. Past contributions strongly suggest that Hernan looks after
> herd7 changes and Jonas takes care of LKMM side of changes.
Yes, this is correct.
Hernan
>
> So my suggestion is to add a Co-developed-by tag of Hernan here:
>
> Co-developed-by: Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
>
> , and let me add a Tested-by:
>
> Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> # herdtools7.7.58
>
> Thanks, Akira
>
>> ---
>> .../Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 27 ++++++++++---------
>> tools/memory-model/README | 2 +-
>> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 3 +++
>> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg | 1 +
>> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 18 +++++++------
>> 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags
2025-02-25 4:28 ` Akira Yokosawa
@ 2025-02-25 18:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2025-02-25 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akira Yokosawa
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arch, lkmm, kernel-team, mingo, stern,
parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, Jonas Oberhauser
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:28:08PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:14:03 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
> >
> > Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic tags
> > would imply. For example, an 'acquire tag on a write does not imply that
> > the write is finally in the Acquire set and provides acquire ordering.
> >
> > To distinguish in those cases between the syntactic tags and actual
> > sets, we capitalize the former, so 'ACQUIRE tags may be present on both
> > reads and writes, but only reads will appear in the Acquire set.
> >
> > For tags where the two concepts are the same we do not use specific
> > capitalization to make this distinction.
> >
> > Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>
> Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> # herdtools7.7.58
I applied your tag to this commit and the previous one, and also your
suggested Co-developed-by tags, thank you very much!
Thanx, Paul
> > ---
> > .../Documentation/herd-representation.txt | 44 ++--
> > tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 22 +-
> > tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 198 +++++++++---------
> > 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-25 18:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 2/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_andnot() with its variants Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 3/7] tools/memory-model: Legitimize current use of tags in LKMM macros Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 4/7] tools/memory-model: Define applicable tags on operation in tools/ Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 5/7] tools/memory-model: Define effect of Mb tags on RMWs " Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-25 4:24 ` Akira Yokosawa
2025-02-25 7:40 ` Hernan Ponce de Leon
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-25 4:28 ` Akira Yokosawa
2025-02-25 18:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-02 0:22 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.12 Paul E. McKenney
2024-08-02 0:22 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).