From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rwonce: fix crash by removing READ_ONCE() for unaligned read
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:54:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250326225444.GA1743548@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wikuhxhdSEgqb-Lkb2ibQM_hAHR1Cu7yxg-gHZu1NF+ug@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 03:41:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> That said, this whole thing worries me. The fact that the compiler
> magically makes READ_ONCE() require alignment that it normally doesn't
> require seems like a bug waiting to happen somewhere else.
For the record, I do not think it is the compiler doing this, it is the
arm64 code after commit e35123d83ee3 ("arm64: lto: Strengthen
READ_ONCE() to acquire when CONFIG_LTO=y") back in 5.11.
> Because I do think that we might want READ_ONCE() on unaligned data in
> general. Should said places generally use "get_unaligned()"? Sure. And
> are unaligned accesses potentially non-atomic anyway because of
> hardware? Also sure.
>
> But one reason for READ_ONCE() isn't for some kind of hardware
> atomicity, it is to avoid any ToCToU issues due to compilers doing bad
> things.
>
> And then this seems to be a serious issue with the whole "READ_ONCE()
> now requires alignment that it didn't require before".
>
> Put another way: I wonder what other cases may lurk around this all...
That change has caused only one issue that I know of, which was fixed by
commit d3f450533bbc ("efi: tpm: Avoid READ_ONCE() for accessing the
event log"). I have not seen any since then until this point and I do
daily boots of -next with LTO enabled on both of my arm64 test machines.
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-26 21:04 [PATCH] rwonce: fix crash by removing READ_ONCE() for unaligned read Jann Horn
2025-03-26 21:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-03-26 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-26 22:50 ` Jann Horn
2025-03-26 22:54 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-03-27 0:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-27 10:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250326225444.GA1743548@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox