From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5452C9A; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 02:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745719547; cv=none; b=k1ANYAMhAagkGMHUn51zPAOwghuHXcAhoRBhPc/uM+eNP62xQDiCMNlyxyarX1YOd9Rqhe6Qf9vXqhNXbW1+ZOFyiBpWOr94GsCjhFGtFSaWbxdfborVjxcWQR42SCHiZEqsB5sMpIKK2Sjdl+vlM8FsOwDjr6X4RrgoDYZ33f0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745719547; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ueSM0+6v5DBafLvS0giIuMW8ulfX++okvZjAf4dve3A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qciB4KJrRcZMNCPA0iiYBcLY4JW5Bscp5cjX27gRmt+24SKbUzAYRH3Tdfyg8+y6ystHs5RgyZtKyvPXt7jDEtkdDZS51/s0U8+73+RnCeLbDgYTX99DJy4iMoYXTMv/mTPd1z0K/nA2038fFXCY4tj7xFsXC2NrUuvVTbzWHOY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sCGIitGd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sCGIitGd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3BFBC4CEE2; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 02:05:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745719547; bh=ueSM0+6v5DBafLvS0giIuMW8ulfX++okvZjAf4dve3A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sCGIitGddXyxO16n9EzYOnE9TFJ4BfEVtkdwKz80J3E+jJ+T0+5bLKSqz39z0wxx6 24UXZR0EAV95qJ5XXRDbMxMqTcdC91UJ7yLt1g+MQAvpXl2yFYqk6BRrAx1lSYwwC8 LHzKORO2cK0uy22Iu+7qhNLgVYT6LB5/fpWCPdxXrFFOtVTTL2V9LEsPxWdqhGc2A7 i7osVXQPlfyBxVjnBs45A0dvXdXOSHPf+nI4xhzbXVaUZB9uKG1IVo9eUa47IVB0+M NHbrX2DWvuSzqqHrTuZcr4Fs1MlwZNwMqI5u3LGtXpfD1hHL8rZ8mIBjmrzaosKfhS 9TnNyl+W7Q6Uw== Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 19:05:50 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Herbert Xu Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, Jason@zx2c4.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] crypto: sha256 - support arch-optimized lib and expose through shash Message-ID: <20250427020550.GG68006@quark> References: <20250426065041.1551914-2-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250427011228.GC68006@quark> <20250427015041.GF68006@quark> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 09:52:42AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 06:50:41PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > > But this one does have a lib/crypto/ interface now. There's no reason not to > > use it here. > > I need to maintain a consistent export format between shash and > ahash Why? And how is that relevant here, when the export format should just be struct sha256_state, as it was before? - Eric