From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
david.laight.linux@gmail.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
ashok.bhat@arm.com, Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 02/14] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:55:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408122538.3610871-3-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408122538.3610871-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Support waiting in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() via
__cmpwait_relaxed(). To ensure that we wake from waiting in
WFE periodically and don't block forever if there are no stores
to ptr, this path is only used when the event-stream is enabled.
Note that when using __cmpwait_relaxed() we ignore the timeout
value, allowing an overshoot by up to the event-stream period.
And, in the unlikely event that the event-stream is unavailable,
fallback to spin-waiting.
Also set SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT to 1 so we do the time-check in
each iteration of smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout().
And finally define ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX to indicate that we have
an optimized implementation of cpu_poll_relax().
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 3 +++
arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 9ea19b74b6c3..e3ce08276e9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1628,6 +1628,9 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
config ARCH_DEFAULT_CRASH_DUMP
def_bool y
+config ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX
+ def_bool y
+
config ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION
def_bool CRASH_RESERVE
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
index 9495c4441a46..6190e178db51 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/kasan-checks.h>
#include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
+#include <asm/vdso/processor.h>
#define __nops(n) ".rept " #n "\nnop\n.endr\n"
#define nops(n) asm volatile(__nops(n))
@@ -219,6 +220,26 @@ do { \
(typeof(*ptr))VAL; \
})
+/* Re-declared here to avoid include dependency. */
+extern bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void);
+
+/*
+ * In the common case, cpu_poll_relax() sits waiting in __cmpwait_relaxed()
+ * for the ptr value to change.
+ *
+ * Since this period is reasonably long, choose SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT
+ * to be 1, so smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() does a
+ * time-check in each iteration.
+ */
+#define SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT 1
+
+#define cpu_poll_relax(ptr, val, timeout_ns) do { \
+ if (arch_timer_evtstrm_available()) \
+ __cmpwait_relaxed(ptr, val); \
+ else \
+ cpu_relax(); \
+} while (0)
+
#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
#endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 12:25 [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 01/14] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-04-20 16:57 ` Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-20 17:50 ` Ankur Arora
2026-04-21 7:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-04-20 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] kunit: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] kunit: add tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-23 17:16 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Andrew Morton
2026-04-23 19:29 ` Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260408122538.3610871-3-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashok.bhat@arm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox