From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38CA82153D8; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777041107; cv=none; b=Qprjc0KEus0CUm4/byVd0ponr/e6z5iCR0aJe8krrnLsSm4OcOfX+J9iqIPirl81d67WtxwwEyePoJ0LNSlgBtXYmpJSK23meBPec4zaTQOIiRZcf1mQNnX4+4cV21T09pp1l2hzBrYjZOeGHXe9M1ii1r6XOZOLjMV81RZEzpE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777041107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ibnzz/auXz3+3udo78jueXIEYRqia08WwlRydX0v9S4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=e6stwAlPe5OZKlTV/RPPdHn284xg8C1mlFZLGCUObdXs+LPT2kY2jTx/D1GruHJVyvJHqDGDaWMbt2zcZGl50DiB1D/N3UOHCXv1D3KeRdLuQRJrutw6D+y+U4rWQDRbXZXF+FN2aoyqH9Dk+NKV2+2efE9UqGX4TVllW3ObyLU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=IQ24m45K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="IQ24m45K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB04DC19425; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:31:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1777041106; bh=Ibnzz/auXz3+3udo78jueXIEYRqia08WwlRydX0v9S4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IQ24m45K2Eibx5mWePKXhBUaJIgB7Zc/UcWu4uQMq3XKGP9ldhs3xDFTn0YhGXB7c YSxHUXD162ct8HxKUG9AJgyJLPDB7d/OpWlSS1RR1stCDdFF/KiUarnzrmrDFSkOUp ryowEUP3rFQPzIO3fQX1oM3yNTtsmrc8LZugGWZ8= Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 07:31:45 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: Pasha Tatashin , Lance Yang , peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, ypodemsk@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, ljs@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, shy828301@gmail.com, riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com, jgross@suse.com, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.2 v10 0/2] skip redundant sync IPIs when TLB flush sent them Message-Id: <20260424073145.b990fe9b925da304508aad71@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <80ab39c2-efb9-4a23-bd56-46d9bb4e41bb@kernel.org> References: <20260424062528.71951-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> <20260424063024.ce42ee6a5546e4d9337dd007@linux-foundation.org> <20260424071533.d28ce90126f05e1c6fc1b740@linux-foundation.org> <80ab39c2-efb9-4a23-bd56-46d9bb4e41bb@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:20:55 +0200 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" wrote: > On 4/24/26 16:15, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:37:04 +0000 Pasha Tatashin wrote: > > > >> On 04-24 06:30, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Sashiko questions: > >>> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260424062528.71951-1-lance.yang@linux.dev > >>> > >>> (I never know if my Sashiko emails are welcome/useful. Maybe Sashiko > >>> said the same stuff about v9 and it's all wrong. But better safe than > >>> sorry!) > >> > >> These emails are helpful; but, I do not believe you should have to > >> manually follow up with a link to every new patch series. > >> > >> Perhaps Sashiko could automatically send a summary email in response to > >> the cover letter, or provide a link once the reviews are complete. For > >> the kexec ML, we opted-in with Roman to receive automated emails from > >> sashiko. > > > > Yep. I'd be OK with an automatic reply-to-all. Maybe some won't like > > that. > > > > An alternative I've discussed with Roman is an automated > > reply-to-author with a cc to a dedicated list (we could use mm-commits > > for now). > > > > Preferences? > > Reply-to-author would likely be better as a first step. Why do you think so? Pasha, is it too early to determine how reply-to-all is working out for kexec?