From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0E11E832A; Sat, 25 Apr 2026 01:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777080003; cv=none; b=OibmEqC/91MRget9Q24Vht3x92s+ZA+UueDvi8smPfHfBvA3fufoe/9HMGCmZdoupBDlraLTQ34kUtkMRq/R2kzi/2Hdihc5SlAQ896HWm9/0WyAbooD2wKoqHdwF8cCndXpnB8GKytt3F53iJTHfK35JeOi6PUS4lMK/72x80I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777080003; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5hX0NBvb8lQVR9PGOGQDik+LqNBSW1MJsV5E+knu75Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=OwzEDcp+u625AYlIyA6CtJGGIYPg3Dc7kUI43JC95BtA6k9CFFB8SobMsMICfMpk3ibq+P87DXo48TRMdebnpH28dONr/+qgZ1KNKstDLTwa8KifiCS5reAyj4M4hA1lRbPNNifB2UGTlllTn+blpLv6HK0dUy1yAzMhRBWJ3GM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mjrkYzfe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mjrkYzfe" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87F15C19425; Sat, 25 Apr 2026 01:20:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777080002; bh=5hX0NBvb8lQVR9PGOGQDik+LqNBSW1MJsV5E+knu75Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mjrkYzfe/ynaLya7MElydTQOfByl2dTFw+dWe5Iu9xb94pN65HFo6oyHZS5vZz1aI uXU1dO74AW7WXgb7Seitov67HoeO4ixUGlXSbfr5sak6kb7AU65tTvPVenCqDklOCc 6dC3iUeWvi316WYbgzlGInzSHI4tkJMIUyVhjbT4jgcLW34/L7gf2bMV0KvK8g5taR PhoJ0K6G0bpSMwIUo8vQhUDDcTacTOfcweH4MiHYtZWmxqbGbDRlMZygoSswElkdAL NLckoYJizpsMmXw9Ql3RQNqMwZVdaS+gQRAR2Z9JzTLXkPPqs8IiWJ/pXXItPf2vdd nc/VoCQDYYh6Q== From: SeongJae Park To: Andrew Morton Cc: SeongJae Park , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , Pasha Tatashin , Lance Yang , peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, ypodemsk@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, ljs@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, shy828301@gmail.com, riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com, jgross@suse.com, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.2 v10 0/2] skip redundant sync IPIs when TLB flush sent them Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 18:19:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20260425011953.85997-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260424073145.b990fe9b925da304508aad71@linux-foundation.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 07:31:45 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:20:55 +0200 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" wrote: > > > On 4/24/26 16:15, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:37:04 +0000 Pasha Tatashin wrote: > > > > > >> On 04-24 06:30, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Sashiko questions: > > >>> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260424062528.71951-1-lance.yang@linux.dev > > >>> > > >>> (I never know if my Sashiko emails are welcome/useful. Maybe Sashiko > > >>> said the same stuff about v9 and it's all wrong. But better safe than > > >>> sorry!) > > >> > > >> These emails are helpful; but, I do not believe you should have to > > >> manually follow up with a link to every new patch series. > > >> > > >> Perhaps Sashiko could automatically send a summary email in response to > > >> the cover letter, or provide a link once the reviews are complete. For > > >> the kexec ML, we opted-in with Roman to receive automated emails from > > >> sashiko. > > > > > > Yep. I'd be OK with an automatic reply-to-all. Maybe some won't like > > > that. > > > > > > An alternative I've discussed with Roman is an automated > > > reply-to-author with a cc to a dedicated list (we could use mm-commits > > > for now). > > > > > > Preferences? > > > > Reply-to-author would likely be better as a first step. > > Why do you think so? > > Pasha, is it too early to determine how reply-to-all is working out for > kexec? DAMON is also opted in to Sashiko's email service. It is replied to only the author and damon@lists.linux.dev. I understand this is the default form of Sashiko's email service, and can flexibly tuned. So I cannot say how reply-to-all will work for mm. But I can say the default setup email service was a huge improvement for my life. I made tools for making my Sashiko handling easier and was quite convinced with that. But the Sashiko's email service made my life much better. Of course, it may differntly applied to others. My personality is not necessarily same to others. Thanks, SJ