Generic Linux architectural discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rqspinlock: Fix order in raw_res_spin_(un)lock_irq to allow schedule
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 16:35:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609143515.GA49951@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d40ba64d-78d9-45f5-99b9-4bfb1fc27f6c@app.fastmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 01:22:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026, at 11:49, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > raw_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore() calls raw_res_spin_unlock() and then
> > restores interrupts, this means preemption is enabled when interrupts
> > are still disabled (as part of raw_res_spin_unlock()) so this cannot
> > trigger an actual preemption.
> > This is inconsistent with other spinlock implementations
> > (raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore() and bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore()
> > itself).
> >
> > Adjust the macro to ensure interrupts are enabled before enabling
> > preemption, allowing to schedule at that point. Make the same
> > modification in the error path of raw_res_spin_lock_irqsave().
> >
> > Fixes: 101acd2e78b1 ("rqspinlock: Add macros for rqspinlock usage")

Yeah, this is right. spinlocks always get one preempt_disable, in
addition they might also get irq or bh disable.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  9:49 [PATCH] rqspinlock: Fix order in raw_res_spin_(un)lock_irq to allow schedule Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-09 11:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-09 13:04   ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-09 13:08     ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-09 14:42     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-09 16:17       ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-09 16:57     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-09 14:35   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-10  0:06   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609143515.GA49951@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox