Generic Linux architectural discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: david@kernel.org
Cc: will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de, ziy@nvidia.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, liam@infradead.org,
	nico.pache@linux.dev, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
	baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev,
	kas@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
	rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	jack@suse.cz, zwisler@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, mason@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: flush dirty file PMDs before removing rmap
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 23:34:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261115153411.87967-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113-dirty_file_pmd-v1-1-8c11f2a2e65f@kernel.org>


On Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 06:15:26PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>Unmapping a file PMD can lose concurrent stores when it races with
>writeback. zap_huge_pmd() removes rmap and drops the PMD lock before the
>gather flushes the TLB. Writeback can then clean the folio while another
>CPU can still write through a stale writable TLB entry. Those stores do
>not fault and dirty the folio again. Filesystem DAX has the same problem
>with its dirty tags.
>
>Commit 5df397dec7c4 ("mm: delay page_remove_rmap() until after the TLB
>has been flushed") fixed the same race for PTEs by adding delayed rmap
>removal to the mmu_gather infrastructure. The PMD path still removes
>rmap before flushing.
>
>Flush the TLB under the PMD lock before removing rmap for dirty file
>PMDs. Skip the early flush at address-space teardown, when no users
>remain, and for mappings without writeback, including shmem and device
>DAX.
>
>Use tlb_can_delay_rmap() to share the PTE path's architecture checks.
>On s390, clearing the entry already handles TLB synchronization, and
>__tlb_remove_page_size() immediately drops the mapping reference, so
>rmap must be removed first. UP cannot have concurrent stores from
>another CPU while holding the page table lock. Make the predicate
>side-effect-free and set the gather's delayed_rmap flag when an entry
>is actually queued for delayed rmap removal.

Right, I'd expect tlb->delayed_rmap to mean the gather still has rmaps to
remove :)

>Queue the folio before the early flush, while the gather still has a
>valid range. Keep batching references and drain a full batch only after
>dropping the PMD lock. The early flush resets the gather's TLB state,
>so draining the batch does not flush that range again.
>
>Although writing to files through mmap is generally discouraged,
>unmapping such mappings may become slower: each dirty file PMD now
>requires a TLB flush under the PMD lock. Future work should properly
>extend the delayed-rmap machinery to PMDs and hold the PMD spinlock
>across multiple entries, so their TLB invalidations and rmap removals
>can be batched.

Nice work!

>Fixes: 4b4bb46d00b3 ("dax: clear dirty entry tags on cache flush")
>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>Reported-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
>Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/aoWw_iKEDLjKL2jr@thinkstation/
>Reported-by: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
>Suggested-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>Suggested-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>---

Nothing jumped out at me, so:

Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-15 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-13 17:15 [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: flush dirty file PMDs before removing rmap David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-15 15:34 ` Lance Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261115153411.87967-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox