From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Stop some of the abuse of BUG() where compile time checks should be used. Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:24:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20469.1322130295@redhat.com> References: <4ECD91E4.5090504@gmail.com> <1322092017-21471-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35906 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754417Ab1KXKZN (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 05:25:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4ECD91E4.5090504@gmail.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Daney Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , "ralf@linux-mips.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , David Rientjes , DM , David Daney , "Pinski, Andrew" David Daney wrote: > We thought about doing that, but without doing some complex preprocessor fu, > the GCC attribute ((error())) thing doesn't do what we want. > > It appears that if more than a single instance of the construct is used in a > compilation unit, the string emitted by the compiler for any of the violations > will be the last string encountered. Have you tried asking the gcc folks if this is likely to get fixed soon? David