From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:33:50 +0200 Message-ID: <2108931.btbn8ltBxI@wuerfel> References: <1410168160-3624-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <3608975.MxU44B73lk@wuerfel> <20140926131746.GA3279@distanz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140926131746.GA3279@distanz.ch> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tobias Klauser Cc: Ley Foon Tan , Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Chung-Lin Tang , Thomas Gleixner List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Friday 26 September 2014 15:17:46 Tobias Klauser wrote: > Speaking of the nios2 part: I'm the author of some parts of this code, > but now also reviewed this series (or rather, intend to do so for the > few remaining patches I didn't review yet). > > What is the appropriate way to account for this? Is Reviewed-By still OK? I > guess I won't be considered an entirely neutral reviewer > I think Reviewed-by is fine here, ideally mention in the full text description who wrote what. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:61108 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754134AbaIZNeJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:34:09 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:33:50 +0200 Message-ID: <2108931.btbn8ltBxI@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <20140926131746.GA3279@distanz.ch> References: <1410168160-3624-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <3608975.MxU44B73lk@wuerfel> <20140926131746.GA3279@distanz.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tobias Klauser Cc: Ley Foon Tan , Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Chung-Lin Tang , Thomas Gleixner Message-ID: <20140926133350.c24Viqmyx-BIcSuTjqW-Z1RUQjwHDYJyHx39Al6yItA@z> On Friday 26 September 2014 15:17:46 Tobias Klauser wrote: > Speaking of the nios2 part: I'm the author of some parts of this code, > but now also reviewed this series (or rather, intend to do so for the > few remaining patches I didn't review yet). > > What is the appropriate way to account for this? Is Reviewed-By still OK? I > guess I won't be considered an entirely neutral reviewer > I think Reviewed-by is fine here, ideally mention in the full text description who wrote what. Arnd