From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] C6X: New architecture Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:49:01 -0400 Message-ID: <22021.1317246541@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <1317155405-26235-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1317246541_2944P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:58549 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753988Ab1I1VtD (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:49:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:41 EDT." <1317155405-26235-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Salter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1317246541_2944P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:41 EDT, Mark Salter said: > This architecture supports members of the Texas Instruments family > of C6x single and multicore DSPs. The multicore DSPs do not support > cache coherancy, so are not suitable for SMP. Is there a usage model for the multicore? I know somebody had some patches for "HPC dedicated compute cores" that would just basically run a userspace process and that's it - would those be applicable here? --==_Exmh_1317246541_2944P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFOg5ZNcC3lWbTT17ARAvUNAKCQNKQ3GKe/pAXziry3frgqRubuOgCfXgzR ea0cd5JWz6qrCamCTDAKsAQ= =00bY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1317246541_2944P--