From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/14] move user_enable_single_step & co prototypes to linux/ptrace.h Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:50:41 +0000 Message-ID: <22619.1265626241@redhat.com> References: <20100202185755.GA3630@lst.de> Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4792 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038Ab0BHKxL (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 05:53:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100202185755.GA3630@lst.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mattst88@gmail.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, rth@twiddle.net, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, hskinnemoen@atmel.com, vapier@gentoo.org, starvik@axis.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, takata@linux-m32r.org, gerg@uclinux.org, monstr@monstr.eu, ralf@linux-mips.org, jdike@addtoit.com, chris@zankel.net Christoph Hellwig wrote: > While in theory user_enable_single_step/user_disable_single_step/ > user_enable_blockstep could also be provided as an inline or macro there's no > good reason to do so, and having the prototype in one places keeps code size > and confusion down. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: David Howells