* Is the SH64 (sub)arch actually meant to be a 64-bit arch?
@ 2014-08-18 14:47 David Howells
2014-08-18 14:47 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2014-08-18 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arch, linux-sh; +Cc: dhowells
Does anyone know if the SH64 arch is actually meant to be a 64-bit arch?
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Is the SH64 (sub)arch actually meant to be a 64-bit arch?
2014-08-18 14:47 Is the SH64 (sub)arch actually meant to be a 64-bit arch? David Howells
@ 2014-08-18 14:47 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2014-08-18 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arch, linux-sh; +Cc: dhowells
Does anyone know if the SH64 arch is actually meant to be a 64-bit arch?
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-18 14:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-18 14:47 Is the SH64 (sub)arch actually meant to be a 64-bit arch? David Howells
2014-08-18 14:47 ` David Howells
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox