From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@j-a-k-j.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:32:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24844.1178098371@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1y7k8x910.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Not lining up with the code following the if statement is also
> a plus. Because it clearly delineates the conditions from the code.
But the condition doesn't line up with the code:
if (veryverylengthycondition1 &&
smallcond2 &&
(conditionnumber3a ||
condition3b)) {
this_is_some_code();
this_is_some_more_code();
}
Personally, for complicated conditions like this, I prefer:
if (veryverylengthycondition1 &&
smallcond2 &&
(conditionnumber3a ||
condition3b)
) {
this_is_some_code();
this_is_some_more_code();
}
But that seems to offend Andrew for some reason (or was it Christoph? or
both?).
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-27 16:51 utrace comments Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-05 9:51 ` Roland McGrath
2006-12-06 21:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 4:02 ` Roland McGrath
2007-04-30 9:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 9:18 ` Russell King
2007-04-30 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 9:33 ` Russell King
2007-04-30 9:45 ` Russell King
2007-04-30 10:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 10:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-22 2:40 ` Roland McGrath
2007-05-10 8:49 ` Roland McGrath
2007-04-30 9:11 ` condingstyle, was " Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-30 18:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-30 18:39 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-04-30 18:42 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-04-30 22:18 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-01 9:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-05-01 13:11 ` Scott Preece
2007-05-01 14:16 ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-01 15:00 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-05-01 16:07 ` David Howells
2007-05-02 2:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-02 9:32 ` David Howells [this message]
2007-05-02 11:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-02 12:05 ` David Howells
2007-05-01 20:12 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-01 15:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-01 15:06 ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-01 20:44 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-01 15:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-05-01 15:11 ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-01 16:15 ` Stuart MacDonald
2007-04-30 21:34 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24844.1178098371@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jakj@j-a-k-j.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).