From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:53062 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751319AbXFYLeE (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:34:04 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20070625110907.GA23438@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20070625110907.GA23438@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1182761357.12109.14.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070625021145.b84ea186.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070625103535.GF22063@parisc-linux.org> Subject: Re: Introduce fixed sys_sync_file_range2() syscall, implement on PowerPC and ARM Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:33:43 +0100 Message-ID: <29425.1182771223@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulus@samba.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com List-ID: Russell King wrote: > Thankfully, linux-arch is low noise. We just need to convince those who > want to add additional syscalls to copy their stuff here, such as that > sys_sync_file_range() patch (http://lwn.net/Articles/177830/) Agreed. And a prototype manual page should perhaps be included in the patch description... David