linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
To: guoren@kernel.org, palmer@rivosinc.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.co,
	zong.li@sifive.com, atishp@atishpatra.org, jszhang@kernel.org,
	bjorn@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: pageattr: Fixup synchronization problem between init_mm and active_mm
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 12:17:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ab8ca7c-a648-f73c-1815-086274af6013@ghiti.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230629082032.3481237-1-guoren@kernel.org>

Hi Guo,

On 29/06/2023 10:20, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> The machine_kexec() uses set_memory_x to add the executable attribute to the
> page table entry of control_code_buffer. It only modifies the init_mm but not
> the current->active_mm. The current kexec process won't use init_mm directly,
> and it depends on minor_pagefault, which is removed by commit 7d3332be011e4


Is the removal of minor_pagefault an issue? I'm not sure I understand 
this part of the changelog.


> ("riscv: mm: Pre-allocate PGD entries for vmalloc/modules area") of 64BIT. So,
> when it met pud mapping on an MMU_SV39 machine, it caused the following:
>
>   kexec_core: Starting new kernel
>   Will call new kernel at 00300000 from hart id 0
>   FDT image at 747c7000
>   Bye...
>   Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffda23b0d000
>   Oops [#1]
>   Modules linked in:
>   CPU: 0 PID: 53 Comm: uinit Not tainted 6.4.0-rc6 #15
>   Hardware name: Sophgo Mango (DT)
>   epc : 0xffffffda23b0d000
>    ra : machine_kexec+0xa6/0xb0
>   epc : ffffffda23b0d000 ra : ffffffff80008272 sp : ffffffc80c173d10
>    gp : ffffffff8150e1e0 tp : ffffffd9073d2c40 t0 : 0000000000000000
>    t1 : 0000000000000042 t2 : 6567616d69205444 s0 : ffffffc80c173d50
>    s1 : ffffffd9076c4800 a0 : ffffffd9076c4800 a1 : 0000000000300000
>    a2 : 00000000747c7000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffd800000000
>    a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffd903619c40 a7 : ffffffffffffffff
>    s2 : ffffffda23b0d000 s3 : 0000000000300000 s4 : 00000000747c7000
>    s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : 0000000000000000
>    s8 : 0000000000000000 s9 : 0000000000000000 s10: 0000000000000000
>    s11: 0000003f940001a0 t3 : ffffffff815351af t4 : ffffffff815351af
>    t5 : ffffffff815351b0 t6 : ffffffc80c173b50
>   status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: ffffffda23b0d000 cause: 000000000000000c
>
> Yes, Using set_memory_x API after boot has the limitation, and at least we
> should synchronize the current->active_mm to fix the problem.
>
> Fixes: d3ab332a5021 ("riscv: add ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY support")
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c | 7 +++++++
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c
> index ea3d61de065b..23d169c4ee81 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,13 @@ static int __set_memory(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t set_mask,
>   				     &masks);
>   	mmap_write_unlock(&init_mm);
>   
> +	if (current->active_mm != &init_mm) {
> +		mmap_write_lock(current->active_mm);
> +		ret =  walk_page_range_novma(current->active_mm, start, end,
> +					     &pageattr_ops, NULL, &masks);
> +		mmap_write_unlock(current->active_mm);
> +	}
> +
>   	flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
>   
>   	return ret;


I don't understand: any page table inherits the entries of 
swapper_pg_dir (see pgd_alloc()), so any kernel page table entry is 
"automatically" synchronized, so why should we synchronize one 4K entry 
explicitly? A PGD entry would need to be synced, but not a PTE entry.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-03 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-29  8:20 [PATCH] riscv: pageattr: Fixup synchronization problem between init_mm and active_mm guoren
2023-07-03 10:17 ` Alexandre Ghiti [this message]
2023-07-04  2:25   ` Guo Ren
2023-07-05  7:00     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-07-05  9:15       ` Guo Ren
2023-07-05 12:06         ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-07-09 13:40           ` Guo Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ab8ca7c-a648-f73c-1815-086274af6013@ghiti.fr \
    --to=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.co \
    --cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).