From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Metcalf Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:20:39 -0400 Message-ID: <2c751e92-9dcb-a42c-7ecb-764d3974c1e4@mellanox.com> References: <20160621154638.1169904b@canb.auug.org.au> <5768E650.2080506@gmail.com> <20160621124247.GM30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5ed77f4c-44eb-ca02-1373-e878d3dea31e@mellanox.com> <20160621140408.GE3704@worktop> <20160621141435.GB7381@worktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160621141435.GB7381@worktop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 6/21/2016 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> I'm not sure who builds the toolchains, but tilepro is in upstream gcc/binutils/etc >>> so should be easy enough to include. There's also a cross-toolchain for x64 I put >>> up a while ago [1] that you could grab if you wanted to try it. >> I usually build my own set -- and just did. But tilepro was not >> included. Lemme go do so. > binutils-2_26-branch builds for tilepro-linux > gcc-6-branch does _not_ build for tilepro-linux That's unexpected. I'll pass this over to our compiler folks. Thanks! -- Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies http://www.mellanox.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-db3on0088.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.88]:65450 "EHLO emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752642AbcFUQ54 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:57:56 -0400 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 References: <20160621154638.1169904b@canb.auug.org.au> <5768E650.2080506@gmail.com> <20160621124247.GM30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5ed77f4c-44eb-ca02-1373-e878d3dea31e@mellanox.com> <20160621140408.GE3704@worktop> <20160621141435.GB7381@worktop> From: Chris Metcalf Message-ID: <2c751e92-9dcb-a42c-7ecb-764d3974c1e4@mellanox.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:20:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160621141435.GB7381@worktop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20160621142039.Wc_tqc54K9IX32m6OSw915thE2n-GkVxxt5z3aDNX7o@z> On 6/21/2016 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> I'm not sure who builds the toolchains, but tilepro is in upstream gcc/binutils/etc >>> so should be easy enough to include. There's also a cross-toolchain for x64 I put >>> up a while ago [1] that you could grab if you wanted to try it. >> I usually build my own set -- and just did. But tilepro was not >> included. Lemme go do so. > binutils-2_26-branch builds for tilepro-linux > gcc-6-branch does _not_ build for tilepro-linux That's unexpected. I'll pass this over to our compiler folks. Thanks! -- Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies http://www.mellanox.com