From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B965714F7E; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="kJTPamY8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=qb7VEPoWO8ajGU/TxkKVc2YmRBYx8R6ZQDgTNtF9mho=; t=1704964934; x=1706174534; b=kJTPamY8DNarEBm2RWGesZ5jW4iP9wf44X+LNS+tn8nPvrp I3oP3EuDaGCsTfjz8a2+IXmfM4ga/ZxEa797xj11jtcBVR5FSHSmb5n7odZ6FxrpXbw6lXf8cOxFm PtoR86e93QBGjcfZWqsT6/B8zYDQhU0SX+g/xfm24ZBGPd8LXCzpXVrfbQTTSBH+xX5+XFlxLdRTg EPfvlo7VtLPdEIMfEiy1niek4Ezo/q26AnfCS9qcF8EkgM3bV/Gn5hxxO6Cj9rDLiS8mJnk54fQ9+ 0+0o1QhEBoCrnbrhvJmDF3cIGKWxb2BogEyPFvl4b4WppqP3GjfmYU7FcddM23Ug==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rNrGD-0000000EybY-2U0Q; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:22:01 +0100 Message-ID: <2cedb42a9eca23c37f03938cbccbd8489d0130d7.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code From: Johannes Berg To: Philipp Stanner , Bjorn Helgaas , Arnd Bergmann , Randy Dunlap , NeilBrown , John Sanpe , Kent Overstreet , Niklas Schnelle , Dave Jiang , Uladzislau Koshchanka , "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" , David Gow , Kees Cook , Rae Moar , Geert Uytterhoeven , "wuqiang.matt" , Yury Norov , Jason Baron , Thomas Gleixner , Marco Elver , Andrew Morton , Ben Dooks , dakr@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:22:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <42cf5ca70c940b3e68c8ad0e4bab6f14f87d4486.camel@redhat.com> References: <20240111085540.7740-1-pstanner@redhat.com> <43478eb70cf5f1120316739803c7622ab5f9e16a.camel@sipsolutions.net> <42cf5ca70c940b3e68c8ad0e4bab6f14f87d4486.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 10:14 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote: > On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 10:03 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 09:55 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote: > > > Second Resend. Would be cool if someone could tell me what I'll > > > have to > > > do so we can get this merged. > >=20 > > I don't even know who'd merge it, but um doesn't seem appropriate... >=20 > UM isn't a recipent, I'd guess it's some mail filter which might make > it appear that way :) Oh. I guess I thought I was CC'ed as UM maintainer :) > The lists I sent this to are > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, > linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org >=20 > Anyways, PCI is for sure who should merge this, since it's 100% about > PCI. Sounds good :) johannes