From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:7125 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750704AbWIOJAF (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:00:05 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <450974F2.1020104@yahoo.com.au> References: <450974F2.1020104@yahoo.com.au> <45085B31.3080504@yahoo.com.au> <45084833.4040602@yahoo.com.au> <44F395DE.10804@yahoo.com.au> <1156750249.3034.155.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <11861.1156845927@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <22461.1158173455@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <21102.1158234082@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent? Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:59:44 +0100 Message-ID: <30414.1158310784@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: David Howells , Arjan van de Ven , Dong Feng , ak@suse.de, Paul Mackerras , Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Nick Piggin wrote: > It is actually larger here. > > text data bss dec hex filename > 970 0 0 970 3ca lib/rwsem-spinlock.o > 576 0 0 576 240 kernel/spinlock.o > =1546 > > text data bss dec hex filename > 1310 0 0 1310 51e lib/rwsem.o > 193 0 0 193 c1 kernel/rwsem.o > =1503 What arch? FRV? David