From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Arch maintainers Ahoy!
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:40:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32064.1337852416@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxcRc_zR9HtFAtrT1exGP2DspP0aA6T49Ph3kZEHHyQWw@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> It's not faster to just do something like
>
> int byte = 4;
>
> #if CONFIG_64BIT
> byte = 8;
> if (has_zero_32bit(value >> 32)) {
> value >>= 32;
> byte = 4;
> }
> #endif
> if (has_zero_16(value >> 16)) {
> value >>= 16;
> byte -= 2;
> }
> if (!value & 0xff00)
> byte--;
> return byte;
Could you use cpu_to_be32/64() and then ffs()? That ought to work for both
variants of endianness. The cpu_to_beXX() should be a noop on BE and is
likely to be a single instruction on LE. The meat of ffs() is usually a
single instruction, though it may have to have zero-detect logic added.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-24 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 16:50 Arch maintainers Ahoy! (was Re: x86: faster strncpy_from_user()) Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 5:46 ` Arch maintainers Ahoy! David Miller
2012-05-23 8:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-23 9:40 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-23 15:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 17:21 ` David Miller
2012-05-23 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 18:16 ` David Miller
2012-05-23 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 18:35 ` David Miller
2012-05-23 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 20:36 ` David Miller
2012-05-23 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-24 2:11 ` David Miller
2012-05-24 5:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2012-05-24 5:56 ` David Miller
2012-05-24 9:40 ` David Howells [this message]
2012-05-24 15:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-13 11:08 ` Michael Cree
2012-06-13 14:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-24 16:45 ` David Howells
2012-05-24 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-24 17:16 ` David Howells
2012-05-23 17:19 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32064.1337852416@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).