From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KEYS: Extend TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME to (almost) all architectures [try #5] Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:35:44 +0100 Message-ID: <32631.1252074944@redhat.com> References: <20090904142440.GM19494@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090903015707.GL19494@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090902072053.3578.69125.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20090902072129.3578.81364.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <29063.1252047959@redhat.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090904142440.GM19494@bombadil.infradead.org> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kyle McMartin Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org Kyle McMartin wrote: > I don't think this depends on the previous patches in the series... it > would probably be easiest if I just merged it with the rest of them > though... The problem I've got is that patch 9/9 depends on this change, but James doesn't have your patch in his tree. David From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62615 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756862AbZIDOgl (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:36:41 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20090904142440.GM19494@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20090904142440.GM19494@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090903015707.GL19494@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090902072053.3578.69125.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20090902072129.3578.81364.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <29063.1252047959@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KEYS: Extend TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME to (almost) all architectures [try #5] Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:35:44 +0100 Message-ID: <32631.1252074944@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Kyle McMartin Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20090904143544.aeDxq0WqiVpTpppTMxuF8oePlpBkVj0YERPDVtRM2iU@z> Kyle McMartin wrote: > I don't think this depends on the previous patches in the series... it > would probably be easiest if I just merged it with the rest of them > though... The problem I've got is that patch 9/9 depends on this change, but James doesn't have your patch in his tree. David