From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, josh@joshtriplett.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()"
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:52:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4150271.zrLzq08T60@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151123163750.GT8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Monday 23 November 2015 16:37:50 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > I think you could do better by simply calling panic("BUG!") instead as
> > BUG() does. It will avoid the printk() call and pushing the file/line
> > number onto the stack. It will also probably not inflate the rodata this
> > way.
>
> Does that not depend on the architectures BUG() implementation? If an
> architecture implements it as a signalling illegal instruction and a
> lookup table, changing it to be a panic() would probably be more code.
Correct, overall, we are down to a 1.40% size reduction compared to
1.70% without my patch and 1.49% with my version:
section CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_BUG=n CONFIG_BUG=n+patch panic("BUG!")
.text 8320248 | 8180944 | 8207688 | 8221848
.rodata 3633720 | 3567144 | 3570648 | 3567344
__bug_table 32508 | --- | --- | ---
__modver 692 | 1584 | 2176 | 1384
.init.text 558132 | 548300 | 550088 | 550592
.exit.text 12380 | 12256 | 12380 | 12448
.data 1016672 | 1016064 | 1016128 | 1016064
Total 14622556 | 14374510 | 14407326 | 14417898
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-23 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 16:25 [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()" Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 16:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 16:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-11-23 17:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 19:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 19:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 16:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 20:16 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 20:16 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 21:17 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 21:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 21:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4150271.zrLzq08T60@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox