From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plam.fujitsu-siemens.com ([217.115.66.9]:33338 "EHLO plam.fujitsu-siemens.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261333AbUKPJjU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:39:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4199CAC3.6070806@fujitsu-siemens.com> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:39:15 +0100 From: Bodo Stroesser MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/11] - UML - fix signal mask on delivery error References: <200411130201.iAD210pT005889@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20041112163442.45fc966f.akpm@osdl.org> <200411142213.iAEMDHbV013050@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <419895BC.6060109@fujitsu-siemens.com> <200411151718.iAFHIG8P002768@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <200411151718.iAFHIG8P002768@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jeff Dike Cc: Andrew Morton , blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jeff Dike wrote: > bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com said: > >>I guess, you are notb using i386 2.6.9. On a 2.6.9-vanilla i386 the >>test doesn't fail! > > > Sorry, I should have mentioned that this host was running 2.4 (stock 2.4.26). > > Jeff > Yes. That makes sense. There are substantial changes in syscall restarting between 2.4 and 2.6 (e.g ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK added). Please run the tests on 2.6.9-i386 to get the correct result: all tests are OK, but sigmasking. Bodo