From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] optimize 64-by-32 ddivision for constant divisors on 32-bit machines Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:27:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4208584.1csaaiK5v3@wuerfel> References: <3830931.6tMHPeiNRU@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.73]:61209 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760013AbbKTM1b convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:27:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:29:33 Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >=20 > > On Monday 16 November 2015 20:20:38 Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Arnd, > > >=20 > > > Please pull the following branch: > > >=20 > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/nicolas.pitre/linux div64 > >=20 > > Pulled into my asm-generic tree now, it should show up in linux-nex= t > > tomorrow. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > I removed a small optimization from the top commit that was included = by=20 > mistake into a patch that was supposed to produce identical code=20 > (noticed by M=E5ns). It's not urgent but it would be good if you coul= d=20 > repull at some point. I already applied another patch on top, could you send a relative patch instead? If that ends up being ugly, I can redo the branch, but I generally prefer to not rebase things I have on kernel.org that I plan to send to Linus. Arnd