From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <429C2820.903@yahoo.com.au> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 19:02:24 +1000 From: Nick Piggin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_idle!! References: <4299523F.90502@yahoo.com.au> <11279.1117529784@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <11279.1117529784@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Howells Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton List-ID: David Howells wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > >>OK, so I've send a patch to Andrew that makes the various rules >>a bit clearer (this did not introduce arch bugs, I found them when >>making this patch). I've attached the complete patch at the end >>of this email. > > > Where's the change to the Documentation/ directory? > Will be included in the patch when I finish getting feedback from the arch people. It is basically all already written (combination of my email to linux-arch, plus the comments in the patch header). I just have to verify it and re-read it. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com