From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B8212E52 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WnRwxTfF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1704964987; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=18eURhzPqjh6OO9ktQkfsRySWY9tUDGvnWhEFURW+fY=; b=WnRwxTfFLtKj6tK+tdiIC9CiBu2FQ5UmcJtezy4g6dA5xxF9gbviGSDCVKpExzyU1gOp95 7kD92sl/crnGq7PaSkZMPDNBJXEEE16c+YtxsnQ5xPrzM0fuBMEECtBUKD9AJ6a3I+t7xh vDtL2RV1cC9tlhmgHuovGSdlHHZDc3E= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-634-YJtdtKYhNuajDSV7ZcY_KA-1; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:23:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: YJtdtKYhNuajDSV7ZcY_KA-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-4670ca688easo439441137.1 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 01:23:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704964986; x=1705569786; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=18eURhzPqjh6OO9ktQkfsRySWY9tUDGvnWhEFURW+fY=; b=Nfd6/2D/m/Ig5J8hlpzKKspwDTvpKMHGUd+XKTZPvbxqiMhscc1AOEp9kdoXup1V5u LPiwEeKHz42YEEJVmS3hPqmQPebRjTJfJ1nBRefpCNIvP1C415lUtEP5s2XYKDml9kWM nYy/JUtlXS2eVt1VpiWA2dKoJeYrAi7sMu7Nzar2lEfqvPbb99eLI3SluZvLagnzOiV1 LFPlI1kMgQ6dckdgfLH+2lit34+pTDXwrSStqfnUG3aHhL9E34RzN70Y3yToKjlrkUrk /t/HxKTRNjzrPADVrs8dM3lXzEX09ftSdfeSEZtE5neQKrZX30t2KjcPPA5QvysTP5ht HMaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzAYkwdqAdKkafamREl26iKhxv+peBkYa9ocggepW6NTRRPFJUO oNp+BBh7x7Uf0CW1cIqMjPN7r/QSwUuOsUCcTL8KYCev+fZ+eIGJBYADN+ZkNSyZUf8YLkjFz2u B08Qr34jxMvEmJo+T67UCtLw9uQxiRqwR69D0Yw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:32d6:b0:468:860:9009 with SMTP id o22-20020a05610232d600b0046808609009mr1095803vss.3.1704964984315; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 01:23:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGsCflr1cnBg8FbDO4MmTrvarkaVOthrTYfY/uZOhpa7zT35UnHSVpI8slHFl4ak53EWIvl9w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:4104:b0:4b6:e3fa:7599 with SMTP id ce4-20020a056122410400b004b6e3fa7599mr1396985vkb.0.1704964487656; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 01:14:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pstanner-thinkpadt14sgen1.remote.csb (nat-pool-muc-t.redhat.com. [149.14.88.26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ch7-20020a05622a40c700b00429970654b6sm281418qtb.33.2024.01.11.01.14.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 01:14:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <42cf5ca70c940b3e68c8ad0e4bab6f14f87d4486.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code From: Philipp Stanner To: Johannes Berg , Bjorn Helgaas , Arnd Bergmann , Randy Dunlap , NeilBrown , John Sanpe , Kent Overstreet , Niklas Schnelle , Dave Jiang , Uladzislau Koshchanka , "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" , David Gow , Kees Cook , Rae Moar , Geert Uytterhoeven , "wuqiang.matt" , Yury Norov , Jason Baron , Thomas Gleixner , Marco Elver , Andrew Morton , Ben Dooks , dakr@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:14:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <43478eb70cf5f1120316739803c7622ab5f9e16a.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20240111085540.7740-1-pstanner@redhat.com> <43478eb70cf5f1120316739803c7622ab5f9e16a.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 10:03 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 09:55 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote: > > Second Resend. Would be cool if someone could tell me what I'll > > have to > > do so we can get this merged. >=20 > I don't even know who'd merge it, but um doesn't seem appropriate... UM isn't a recipent, I'd guess it's some mail filter which might make it appear that way :) The lists I sent this to are linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Anyways, PCI is for sure who should merge this, since it's 100% about PCI. > >=20 > > @Stable-Kernel: > > You receive this patch series because its first patch fixes leaks > > in > > PCI. >=20 > Too early for that, stable just ignores stuff before it hits > mainline. I know, they're in CC because of the "Fixes: " P. >=20 > johannes >=20