From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E00710A03; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="jzhSvAFt" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=WnWZQJddNOYwO4jIGWVJBNe/stvkO8djrsCMVObC998=; t=1704963815; x=1706173415; b=jzhSvAFtd7FbMWhuaS3fCEDPhOzGkVGqbBxGCCMowWyt5gn Vol40lHSaac2geRPlXcxPF4knMO2Epg2GOJNkAA52CQfq/gC2L/N9CZna0oCQ34nel7G7HieZMGax LyPMNLhfqhRfbEgtelwPMs4YB1QYNvzM/3kBOoLrfsxEQUJQUq3dd+wolhKujfFcTnaq5C749UcX4 OsUAeeXT38bVNmjAwDnel8fXZCj4s6kfN8HEZjdSaMZd2ZLqTVRPxoOnSHdtFBEyh5X6MVaEdLRy6 g6mkp6iqvEPYWW+QDJ/q3jS+9V/NHGIHwtMadsag2REH3ijjLQTzWcQ9qo1obfbw==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rNqxt-0000000Exm9-1jk6; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:03:05 +0100 Message-ID: <43478eb70cf5f1120316739803c7622ab5f9e16a.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code From: Johannes Berg To: Philipp Stanner , Bjorn Helgaas , Arnd Bergmann , Randy Dunlap , NeilBrown , John Sanpe , Kent Overstreet , Niklas Schnelle , Dave Jiang , Uladzislau Koshchanka , "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" , David Gow , Kees Cook , Rae Moar , Geert Uytterhoeven , "wuqiang.matt" , Yury Norov , Jason Baron , Thomas Gleixner , Marco Elver , Andrew Morton , Ben Dooks , dakr@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:03:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20240111085540.7740-1-pstanner@redhat.com> References: <20240111085540.7740-1-pstanner@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 09:55 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote: > Second Resend. Would be cool if someone could tell me what I'll have to > do so we can get this merged. I don't even know who'd merge it, but um doesn't seem appropriate... >=20 > @Stable-Kernel: > You receive this patch series because its first patch fixes leaks in > PCI. Too early for that, stable just ignores stuff before it hits mainline. johannes