From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:45707 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932512AbWJFAwy (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:52:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4525A8D8.9050504@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:52:40 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers References: <20061002132116.2663d7a3.akpm@osdl.org> <20061002162049.17763.39576.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20061002162053.17763.26032.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <18975.1160058127@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <18975.1160058127@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Howells Cc: Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Greg KH , David Brownell , Alan Stern List-ID: The overwhelming majority of irq handlers don't use the 'irq' argument either... the driver-supplied pointer is what drivers use, exclusively, to differentiate between different instances. If we are going to break all the irq handlers, I'd suggest going ahead and removing that one too. Jeff