From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:45679 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751466AbXB0Ssn (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:48:43 -0500 Message-ID: <45E47D08.5020802@goop.org> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:48:40 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [patch 09/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: remove HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFETIME, define no-op architecture implementations References: <20070227081337.434798469@goop.org> <20070227081632.356636957@goop.org> <1172589358.3408.2.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <45E46889.9090801@goop.org> <1172597726.3408.25.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <45E470D6.7050401@goop.org> <1172599480.3408.28.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> In-Reply-To: <1172599480.3408.28.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Chris Wright , Zachary Amsden , Rusty Russell , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: James Bottomley wrote: > Yes ... I forgot about that ... we'd need an asm/mmu_context_paravirt.h > on every arch. > Yep. And I'm not too keen on that name; one could imagine other uses for those hooks, even if they're being used for x86 paravirtualization in this instance. > I suppose this is just me being lazy ... I'm currently doing a bit of a > rewrite in asm-parisc/mmu_context.h and I didn't want a massive merge > conflict. > Well, I'm happy to create asm-generic/mm_hooks.h or something, and reduce all the changes to asm-*/mmu_context.h to a one-liner. J