* Changes to smp_call_function_single() semantics
@ 2007-07-09 15:05 Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2007-07-09 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arch
Recently I wrote an on_cpu() function, which is like
smp_call_function_single() except that it works if the target cpu
happens to be the current cpu. Andi Kleen requested that I fold this
into smp_call_function_single(), which I did. The change is trivial as
might be expected.
My plan is to push the x86 changes with the kvm updates in the current
merge window (since kvm depends on this functionality), and submit
patches to other arches individually to the arch maintainer since I
can't even compile test them.
Are there any objections to this?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-07-09 15:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-09 15:05 Changes to smp_call_function_single() semantics Avi Kivity
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).