From: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds
<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
shaggy-V7BBcbaFuwjMbYB6QlFGEg@public.gmane.org,
axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Clark Williams <williams-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2]: introduce fast_gup
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:26:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480C9619.2050201@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208781013.7115.173.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:00 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>>> Finally, I don't think that comment is correct in the first place. It's
>>> not that simple. The thing is, even *with* the memory barrier in place, we
>>> may have:
>>>
>>> CPU#1 CPU#2
>>> ===== =====
>>>
>>> fast_gup:
>>> - read low word
>>>
>>> native_set_pte_present:
>>> - set low word to 0
>>> - set high word to new value
>>>
>>> - read high word
>>>
>>> - set low word to new value
>>>
>>> and so you read a low word that is associated with a *different* high
>>> word! Notice?
>>>
>>> So trivial memory ordering is _not_ enough.
>>>
>>> So I think the code literally needs to be something like this
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
>>>
>>> static inline pte_t native_get_pte(pte_t *ptep)
>>> {
>>> pte_t pte;
>>>
>>> retry:
>>> pte.pte_low = ptep->pte_low;
>>> smp_rmb();
>>> pte.pte_high = ptep->pte_high;
>>> smp_rmb();
>>> if (unlikely(pte.pte_low != ptep->pte_low)
>>> goto retry;
>>> return pte;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I think this is still broken. Suppose that after reading pte_high
>> native_set_pte() is called again on another cpu, changing pte_low back
>> to the original value (but with a different pte_high). You now have
>> pte_low from second native_set_pte() but pte_high from the first
>> native_set_pte().
>>
>
> I think the idea was that for user pages we only use set_pte_present()
> which does the low=0 thing first.
>
Doesn't matter. The second native_set_pte() (or set_pte_present())
executes atomically:
fast_gup:
- read low word (l0)
native_set_pte_present:
- set low word to 0
- set high word to new value (h1)
- set low word to new value (l1)
- read high word (h1)
native_set_pte_present:
- set low word to 0
- set high word to new value (h2)
- set low word to new value (l2)
- re-read low word (l2)
If l2 happens to be equal to l0, then the check succeeds and we have a
splintered pte h1:l0.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
shaggy@austin.ibm.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2]: introduce fast_gup
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:26:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480C9619.2050201@qumranet.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20080421132649.ZwSttnIDFJInN3naTX2GLWTOMkqno5jg7K6Un5jTT8A@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208781013.7115.173.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:00 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>>> Finally, I don't think that comment is correct in the first place. It's
>>> not that simple. The thing is, even *with* the memory barrier in place, we
>>> may have:
>>>
>>> CPU#1 CPU#2
>>> ===== =====
>>>
>>> fast_gup:
>>> - read low word
>>>
>>> native_set_pte_present:
>>> - set low word to 0
>>> - set high word to new value
>>>
>>> - read high word
>>>
>>> - set low word to new value
>>>
>>> and so you read a low word that is associated with a *different* high
>>> word! Notice?
>>>
>>> So trivial memory ordering is _not_ enough.
>>>
>>> So I think the code literally needs to be something like this
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
>>>
>>> static inline pte_t native_get_pte(pte_t *ptep)
>>> {
>>> pte_t pte;
>>>
>>> retry:
>>> pte.pte_low = ptep->pte_low;
>>> smp_rmb();
>>> pte.pte_high = ptep->pte_high;
>>> smp_rmb();
>>> if (unlikely(pte.pte_low != ptep->pte_low)
>>> goto retry;
>>> return pte;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I think this is still broken. Suppose that after reading pte_high
>> native_set_pte() is called again on another cpu, changing pte_low back
>> to the original value (but with a different pte_high). You now have
>> pte_low from second native_set_pte() but pte_high from the first
>> native_set_pte().
>>
>
> I think the idea was that for user pages we only use set_pte_present()
> which does the low=0 thing first.
>
Doesn't matter. The second native_set_pte() (or set_pte_present())
executes atomically:
fast_gup:
- read low word (l0)
native_set_pte_present:
- set low word to 0
- set high word to new value (h1)
- set low word to new value (l1)
- read high word (h1)
native_set_pte_present:
- set low word to 0
- set high word to new value (h2)
- set low word to new value (l2)
- re-read low word (l2)
If l2 happens to be equal to l0, then the check succeeds and we have a
splintered pte h1:l0.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-21 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 2:54 [patch 0/2]: lockless get_user_pages patchset Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 2:54 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20080328025455.GA8083-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 2:55 ` [patch 1/2]: x86: implement pte_special Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 2:55 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20080328025541.GB8083-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 3:23 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 3:23 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080327.202334.250213398.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 3:31 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 3:31 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20080328033149.GD8083-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 3:44 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 3:44 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080327.204431.201380891.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 4:04 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 4:04 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20080328040442.GE8083-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 4:09 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 4:09 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080327.210910.101408473.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 4:15 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 4:15 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20080328041519.GF8083-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 4:16 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 4:16 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080327.211632.02770342.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 4:19 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 4:19 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 4:17 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 4:17 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 3:00 ` [patch 2/2]: introduce fast_gup Nick Piggin
2008-03-28 3:00 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20080328030023.GC8083-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-28 10:01 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-28 10:01 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-17 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-17 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-17 15:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-17 15:25 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.00.0804170814090.2879-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-17 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-17 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-17 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-17 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.00.0804170916470.2879-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-17 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-17 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-17 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-17 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.00.0804170940270.2879-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-17 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-17 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-17 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-17 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.00.0804171127310.2879-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 3:14 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-22 3:14 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-18 6:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-04-18 6:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-04-18 14:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-18 14:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-18 9:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-18 9:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-21 12:00 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-21 12:00 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <480C81C4.8030200-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-21 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-21 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-21 13:26 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-04-21 13:26 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <480C9619.2050201-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-21 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-21 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 3:23 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-22 3:23 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20080422032319.GB21993-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 7:19 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-22 7:19 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-22 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-22 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-22 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 9:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-22 9:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-14 18:33 ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-05-15 1:13 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480C9619.2050201@qumranet.com \
--to=avi-atkuwr5tajbwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \
--cc=npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shaggy-V7BBcbaFuwjMbYB6QlFGEg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=williams-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox