From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC 03/32] fs: introduce sys_utimens64at Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 16:55:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4824036.97Kbggn7gm@wuerfel> References: <1401480116-1973111-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1401480116-1973111-4-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Schwab Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, joseph@codesourcery.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, hch@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, geert@linux-m68k.org, lftan@altera.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Saturday 31 May 2014 11:22:38 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > > > +asmlinkage long sys_utimens64at(int dfd, const char __user *filename, > > All existing syscall names have the 64 suffix last, including the *at > variants, so sys_utimensat64 would be more in line. Ok, makes sense. I actually typed utimensat64 a few times myself and couldn't really decide which one to use. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:49845 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750949AbaEaOzx (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2014 10:55:53 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC 03/32] fs: introduce sys_utimens64at Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 16:55:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4824036.97Kbggn7gm@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: References: <1401480116-1973111-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1401480116-1973111-4-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andreas Schwab Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, joseph@codesourcery.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, hch@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, geert@linux-m68k.org, lftan@altera.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20140531145544.0O_duT5FlQz-yW8gBfF7_v30rPWQ2VHwzGVjLDQuNtQ@z> On Saturday 31 May 2014 11:22:38 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > > > +asmlinkage long sys_utimens64at(int dfd, const char __user *filename, > > All existing syscall names have the 64 suffix last, including the *at > variants, so sys_utimensat64 would be more in line. Ok, makes sense. I actually typed utimensat64 a few times myself and couldn't really decide which one to use. Arnd