From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: MMU notifiers review and some proposals Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:19:44 -0500 Message-ID: <48907880.3020105@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080724143949.GB12897@wotan.suse.de> <20080725214552.GB21150@duo.random> <20080726030810.GA18896@wotan.suse.de> <20080726113813.GD21150@duo.random> <20080726122826.GA17958@wotan.suse.de> <20080726130202.GA9598@duo.random> <20080726131450.GC21820@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51365 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753227AbYG3OUc (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:20:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080726131450.GC21820@wotan.suse.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Linux Memory Management List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, steiner@sgi.com Nick Piggin wrote: > BTW. has anyone else actually looked at mmu notifiers or have an > opinion on this? It might be helpful for me to get someone else's > perspective. Yes we have had so much talk about this that I am a bit tired of talking about it. I vaguely remember bringing up the same point a couple of months ago. If you can make it work then great.