From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@petalogix.com>
Subject: Microblaze noMMU/MMU merge
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:45:47 +0200
Message-ID: <49ED79AB.10004@petalogix.com>
Reply-To: michal.simek@petalogix.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com ([209.85.220.158]:45378 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f158.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751732AbZDUHpw (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:45:52 -0400
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

Hi All,

I would like to say your opinion about putting together Microblaze MMU
arch to noMMU version.

In C code will be #ifdef CONFIG_MMU ... #endif  or #ifndef.

Here is proposal for headers. The similar style is used in m68k but I
would like to have the same code
for both archs in main file.

#ifndef _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PAGE_H
#define _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PAGE_H

code for noMMU and MMU which is the same for both.

#ifdef __uClinux__
#include "page_no.h" -> noMMU specific
#else
#include "page_mm.h"-> MMU specific
#endif
#endif /* _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PAGE_H */


Thanks for your suggestion,
Michal



-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663