From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Minimal linker script Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 10:53:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4A0714B5.40402@zytor.com> References: <20090509080006.GA22617@uranus.ravnborg.org> <4A061158.3010604@zytor.com> <20090510085504.GA18719@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:60958 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751480AbZEJRyI (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 13:54:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090510085504.GA18719@uranus.ravnborg.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: linux arch , LKML , Tim Abbott Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Do you then say that i386 could allow us to use absolute symbols, > and we could adjust in the code instead? > > That would make the linker script nicer but with added > complexity in the code.. > Correct. The key, obviously, is to make sure we don't end up having to adjust in multiple places all the time. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.