From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/2] genericirq: change ack/mask in irq_chip to take irq_desc instead of irq Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:07:45 -0800 Message-ID: <4B85A331.7040909@kernel.org> References: <1266029390-30907-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <4B7676BB.8030608@kernel.org> <4B772A54.1000000@kernel.org> <4B773CEB.9010609@kernel.org> <4B7CA9A1.3020806@kernel.org> <4B7CAADD.2060000@kernel.org> <4B83781B.20307@kernel.org> <4B837930.2050907@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Rusty Russell , Suresh Siddha , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 02/24/2010 01:36 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Yinghai Lu writes: > >> will have >> void (*ack)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> void (*mask)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> void (*mask_ack)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> void (*unmask)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> void (*eoi)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> >> so for sparseirq with raidix tree, we don't call extra irq_to_desc, and could use desc directly > > Overall this looks pretty decent. This look pretty complete. > How many platforms did you manage to compile test this on? x86 only. any guide to setup cross compiling for 22 archs ? on x86_64 platform please Thanks Yinghai Lu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:49311 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758360Ab0BXWLh (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:11:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4B85A331.7040909@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:07:45 -0800 From: Yinghai Lu MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/2] genericirq: change ack/mask in irq_chip to take irq_desc instead of irq References: <1266029390-30907-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <4B7676BB.8030608@kernel.org> <4B772A54.1000000@kernel.org> <4B773CEB.9010609@kernel.org> <4B7CA9A1.3020806@kernel.org> <4B7CAADD.2060000@kernel.org> <4B83781B.20307@kernel.org> <4B837930.2050907@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Eric W. Biederman" , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Rusty Russell , Suresh Siddha , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20100224220745.4vx-D9LKHRJXPyLhA92M7IEk5zW4ZLM4NKDbjmuJEik@z> On 02/24/2010 01:36 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Yinghai Lu writes: > >> will have >> void (*ack)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> void (*mask)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> void (*mask_ack)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> void (*unmask)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> void (*eoi)(struct irq_desc *desc); >> >> so for sparseirq with raidix tree, we don't call extra irq_to_desc, and could use desc directly > > Overall this looks pretty decent. This look pretty complete. > How many platforms did you manage to compile test this on? x86 only. any guide to setup cross compiling for 22 archs ? on x86_64 platform please Thanks Yinghai Lu