From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:59:38 -0800 Message-ID: <4B98326A.1020905@kernel.org> References: <1268256267-3769-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1268256267-3769-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <20100310234620.GA3897@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:34878 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932905Ab0CKABB (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:01:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100310234620.GA3897@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On 03/10/2010 03:46 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:24:26PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> move it to kernel/fw_memmap.c from arch/x86/kernel/e820.c >> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu >> >> --- >> arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 130 ----- >> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 1142 -------------------------------------------- >> include/linux/bootmem.h | 2 >> include/linux/fw_memmap.h | 114 ++++ >> kernel/Makefile | 2 >> kernel/fw_memmap.c | 1134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Yuck. So you think we should use > 1100 lines of fw_memmap.c code > instead of the 541 lines of lib/lmb.c? Why exactly would that be > better? > even worse you should count early_res + fw_memmap YH