From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok() Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 23:11:24 -0700 Message-ID: <4BF0DE0C.2000905@oracle.com> References: <1273796396-29649-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273796396-29649-16-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273804337.21352.396.camel@pasglop> <4BECF158.5070200@oracle.com> <1273825807.21352.601.camel@pasglop> <4BED7CE3.1020507@oracle.com> <1273876234.21352.639.camel@pasglop> <20100515073231.GB9877@elte.hu> <1274056773.21352.700.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:23910 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753099Ab0EQGMx (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 02:12:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1274056773.21352.700.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2010 05:39 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 09:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> Btw., it would be nice to ready the LMB core bits for >> upstream for 2.6.35 if there's agreement about them - >> that will make the subsequent x86 patches much easier >> to merge. > > Well, 2.6.34 was released already. I think it's a bit premature. We need > to fix a few more things (the result codes for example) and do more > testing to ensure we didn't break other archs. > so looks like your change will hit 2.6.35, and my x86 changes will hit 2.6.36? that is too long. YH