From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/35] lmb: prepare x86 to use lmb to replace early_res Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:03:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4BF18500.60105@zytor.com> References: <1273796396-29649-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273796396-29649-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273803143.21352.353.camel@pasglop> <4BECEB8D.8070600@oracle.com> <1273824578.21352.579.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:46160 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752374Ab0EQSK1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 14:10:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1273824578.21352.579.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Yinghai , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On 05/14/2010 01:09 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > No. That is not the point. Read the rest of my email ! > > We need to -sanitize- those errors. _Maybe_ exposing LMB_ERROR is the > right way to do so, but in that case, we need to make -all- function use > the same error code. Right now, some fail with 0 and some with > LMB_ERROR. > Using errnos like the rest of the kernel seems like the right thing to do, IMO. -hpa