From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Metcalf Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/tile: new multi-core architecture for Linux Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:03:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4BFE89C3.7000500@tilera.com> References: <201005200543.o4K5hFRF006079@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <201005271041.30519.arnd@arndb.de> <4BFE73DF.5090107@tilera.com> <201005271611.47963.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from king.tilera.com ([72.1.168.226]:37745 "EHLO king.tilera.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754687Ab0E0PDf (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 11:03:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201005271611.47963.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On 5/27/2010 10:11 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > You're right that any commit should result in something that's buildable. > In this case I think you can make an exception because before the first > patch, nothing builds in arch/tile, so you extend that phase to two > or three patches before you get to the first one that's actually > compilable. > OK, will do. I'm also planning to do a hard git reset to remove the original patch, since much of it is no longer wanted anyway. I'll mail out a diff of what has changed relative to that original submission as just a regular "diff -ru" so previous reviewers can see what has changed. -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com