From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/3] remove useless ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:59:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4C1A1C1F.5030302@fusionio.com> References: <20100601182452.GA3564@kernel.dk> <20100602113022I.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20100602061815.GH3564@kernel.dk> <20100617214643N.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100617214643N.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "James.Bottomley@suse.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 2010-06-17 14:48, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 08:18:15 +0200 > Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 01 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:24:52 +0200 >>> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, May 31 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>>>> This patchset removes useless ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD: >>>>> >>>>> - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD is irrelevant to the majority of architectures but >>>>> they have to define it. >>>>> >>>>> - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD definition is inconsistent on architectures; ISA >>>>> DMA addressing restriction, DMA addressing restriction or something >>>>> else. >>>>> >>>>> - Everyone (except for SCSI) uses dma_mask instead of ancient >>>>> ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD. >>>>> >>>>> Only SCSI uses ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD for ancient drivers with non-zero >>>>> unchecked_isa_dma. We can safely remove ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD usage in >>>>> SCSI. So we can clean up ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD on the whole tree. >>>> >>>> Looks good. James, it's probably easier if I just carry this patch set. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Any tree works for me, I thought about -mm though. >>> >>> Can you replace [1/3] with the following? >>> >>> I fixed the subject and the body, s/aha1532/aha1542/; >>> >>> Somehow I forgot to remove unused BAD_SG_DMA(). >> >> I'll collect the acks and include this update. > > Can you send this to -next via your tree? I want this to be > compile-tested on -next on various architectures. Yep, going out now. -- Jens Axboe From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:35902 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759969Ab0FQM7M (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:59:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4C1A1C1F.5030302@fusionio.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:59:11 +0200 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/3] remove useless ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD References: <20100601182452.GA3564@kernel.dk> <20100602113022I.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20100602061815.GH3564@kernel.dk> <20100617214643N.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20100617214643N.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "James.Bottomley@suse.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <20100617125911.0r1XkyFTvquaL4zRzH2PqrL9_pe-jU2Vt0xT-bN_Cpo@z> On 2010-06-17 14:48, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 08:18:15 +0200 > Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 01 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:24:52 +0200 >>> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, May 31 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>>>> This patchset removes useless ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD: >>>>> >>>>> - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD is irrelevant to the majority of architectures but >>>>> they have to define it. >>>>> >>>>> - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD definition is inconsistent on architectures; ISA >>>>> DMA addressing restriction, DMA addressing restriction or something >>>>> else. >>>>> >>>>> - Everyone (except for SCSI) uses dma_mask instead of ancient >>>>> ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD. >>>>> >>>>> Only SCSI uses ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD for ancient drivers with non-zero >>>>> unchecked_isa_dma. We can safely remove ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD usage in >>>>> SCSI. So we can clean up ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD on the whole tree. >>>> >>>> Looks good. James, it's probably easier if I just carry this patch set. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Any tree works for me, I thought about -mm though. >>> >>> Can you replace [1/3] with the following? >>> >>> I fixed the subject and the body, s/aha1532/aha1542/; >>> >>> Somehow I forgot to remove unused BAD_SG_DMA(). >> >> I'll collect the acks and include this update. > > Can you send this to -next via your tree? I want this to be > compile-tested on -next on various architectures. Yep, going out now. -- Jens Axboe