From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partially revert patch that encloses asm-offset.h numbers in brackets Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:51:06 -0700 Message-ID: <4CC5C38A.8090508@linux.intel.com> References: <4CC5A748.6050903@zytor.com> <4CC5B1A1020000780001EF7C@vpn.id2.novell.com> <20101025140218.5092.74117.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <28707.1288018465@redhat.com> <4CC5B8D3020000780001EFB4@vpn.id2.novell.com> <30620.1288022370@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:22941 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754522Ab0JYRvH (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:51:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <30620.1288022370@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Howells Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Jan Beulich , Alexander van Heukelum , Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/25/2010 08:59 AM, David Howells wrote: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> As such, the only options I can really think about overriding the sed >> expression for x86 or just saying gcc 2.16.90 or later is required... > > Do you mean binutils-2.16.90? Yes, of course. -hpa