From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 000/211] unicore32 architecture support Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:27:23 +0100 Message-ID: <4D00E74B.3030401@kernel.org> References: <01ca01cb9783$7818c3f0$684a4bd0$@mprc.pku.edu.cn> <4D00A672.9050906@kernel.org> <4D00E212.9080001@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:47870 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752421Ab0LIO1f (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:27:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Guan Xuetao , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/2010 03:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > It's not a question of merging. It's a question of reviewing and I've > done quite a bunch of reviews on new archs, so I know what I'm talking > about. Reviewing a single patch with everything and the world included > is just not workable. Sure, I agree the per-topic patch series would be much better for reviewing. Then, just make _that_ point. Don't go to the opposite extreme and claim unthreaded per-file 200+ patches in whatever order are better as that's painful for everyone on the mailing list. Thanks. -- tejun