From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:36 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF8329C.7000904@zytor.com> References: <20110614190850.GA13526@linux-mips.org> <4DF7C3CA.9050902@zytor.com> <20110614223404.GA30057@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110614223404.GA30057@linux-mips.org> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org To: Ralf Baechle Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Chen Liqin , Chris Metcalf , Chris Zankel , "David S. Miller" , Fenghua Yu , Geert Uytterhoeven , Guan Xuetao , Helge Deller , Ingo Molnar , Ivan Kokshaysky , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Jesper Nilsson , Kyle McMartin , Lennox Wu , Matt Turner , Michal Simek , Mikael Starvik , Paul Mackerras Pa List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be > used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test > matrix for no good reason. > I see... that's why a bunch of devices that only exist on ARM and MIPS SoCs are offered on x86 platforms? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.