From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Add assertion checking macros
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:43:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E95D1B7.4050603@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111012164728.539.29820.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On 10/12/2011 06:47 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Add a range of ASSERT* macros to linux/assert.h for performing runtime
> assertions. These will use assertion_failure() to cause an annotated oops if
> the check fails.
>
> The checks are only enabled under two circumstances:
>
> (1) CONFIG_DEBUG_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=y
>
> (2) ENABLE_ASSERTIONS is defined prior to the #inclusion of <linux/assert.h>
>
> There are five macros provided:
>
> (a) ASSERT(X)
>
> Issue an assertion failure error if X is false. In other words, require
> the expression X to be true. For example:
>
> ASSERT(val != 0);
>
> There is no need to display val here in the case the expression fails
> since it can only be 0. If this fails, it produces an error like the
> following:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> ASSERTION FAILED at fs/fscache/main.c:109!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>
> (b) ASSERTCMP(X, OP, Y)
>
> Issue an assertion failure error if the expression X OP Y is false. For
> example:
>
> ASSERTCMP(x, >, 12)
>
>
> If an oops is produced, then the values of X and Y will be displayed in
> hex, along with OP:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> ASSERTION FAILED at fs/fscache/main.c:109!
> Check 2 > c is false
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>
> (c) ASSERTRANGE(X, OP, Y, OP2, Z)
>
> Issue an assertion failure error if the expression X OP Y or if the
> expression Y OP2 Z is false. Typically OP and OP2 would be < or <=,
> looking something like:
>
> ASSERTRANGE(11, <, x, <=, 13);
>
> and giving the following error:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> ASSERTION FAILED at fs/fscache/main.c:109!
> Check b < 2 <= d is false
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Hmm, but why not have a single something-like-"ASSERT" doing the same as
in userspace:
#define ASSERT(X) do { \
if (unlikely(!(X))) \
cond_assertion_failed("Assertion '" #X "' failed"); \
} while (0)
You would not need zillion of sub-macros then.
thanks,
--
js
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-12 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-12 16:47 [PATCH 1/7] Add assertion support with annotated oopsing David Howells
2011-10-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] Add assertion checking macros David Howells
2011-10-12 16:47 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 17:43 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2011-10-12 20:36 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] Make shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree() use the core assertion code David Howells
2011-10-12 16:47 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] FS-Cache: Use new core assertion macros David Howells
2011-10-12 16:47 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] CacheFiles: " David Howells
2011-10-12 16:47 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] AFS: " David Howells
2011-10-12 16:48 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] RxRPC: " David Howells
2011-10-12 16:48 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] Add assertion support with annotated oopsing Ingo Molnar
2011-10-12 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-12 17:23 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 17:23 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E95D1B7.4050603@gmail.com \
--to=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).