linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] compat: poll() in 32-bit applications does not handle negative timeout values properly on 64-bit kernels
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:54:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3602A9.3060206@akamai.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 664 bytes --]

We have hit an issue where our 32-bit applications using poll() and
passing in a value of -1 for the timeout value return after ~49 days
(2^32 msec), instead of waiting indefinitely. I've instrumented the
kernel and found we are hitting the case where poll() believes we've
passed in a positive number and thus creates a timespec, etc. I've
implemented compat_sys_poll() to sign-extend the timeout value and
resolve the issue.

There was an almost identical patch submitted last year, but for
whatever reason did not make it in:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/18/19

I am guessing there are other architectures affected by this bug. This
patch only fixes x86.

Josh

[-- Attachment #2: compat-sys-poll.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2339 bytes --]

commit cde9eb901ccb3b5af3e501b018b90f16c53942c2
Author: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
Date:   Mon Feb 6 20:51:31 2012 -0800

    compat: poll() in 32-bit applications does not handle negative timeout values properly on 64-bit kernels

    We have observed our 32-bit applications running on 64-bit kernels do not
    wait infinitely when passed a negative value for the timeout argument.
    Instead we see poll() returning in ~49 days or 2^32 msecs, because the
    timeout argument is not getting sign-extended. Implementing
    compat_sys_poll() to handle this case.

    Reported-by: Phil Lisiecki <lisiecki@akamai.com>
    Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
    Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

diff --git a/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl b/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
index ce98e28..8407150 100644
--- a/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
+++ b/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
 165	i386	getresuid		sys_getresuid16
 166	i386	vm86			ptregs_vm86			sys32_vm86_warning
 167	i386	query_module
-168	i386	poll			sys_poll
+168	i386	poll			sys_poll			compat_sys_poll
 169	i386	nfsservctl
 170	i386	setresgid		sys_setresgid16
 171	i386	getresgid		sys_getresgid16
diff --git a/fs/compat.c b/fs/compat.c
index fa9d721..77bd50e 100644
--- a/fs/compat.c
+++ b/fs/compat.c
@@ -1611,6 +1611,12 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_pselect6(int n, compat_ulong_t __user *inp,
 				 sigsetsize);
 }
 
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
+	int timeout_msecs)
+{
+	return sys_poll(ufds, nfds, timeout_msecs);
+}
+
 asmlinkage long compat_sys_ppoll(struct pollfd __user *ufds,
 	unsigned int nfds, struct compat_timespec __user *tsp,
 	const compat_sigset_t __user *sigmask, compat_size_t sigsetsize)
diff --git a/include/linux/compat.h b/include/linux/compat.h
index 41c9f65..66e61e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/compat.h
+++ b/include/linux/compat.h
@@ -433,6 +433,8 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_pselect6(int n, compat_ulong_t __user *inp,
 				    compat_ulong_t __user *exp,
 				    struct compat_timespec __user *tsp,
 				    void __user *sig);
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
+				int timeout_msecs);
 asmlinkage long compat_sys_ppoll(struct pollfd __user *ufds,
 				 unsigned int nfds,
 				 struct compat_timespec __user *tsp,

             reply	other threads:[~2012-02-11  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-11  5:54 Josh Hunt [this message]
2012-02-11  5:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2] compat: poll() in 32-bit applications does not handle negative timeout values properly on 64-bit kernels Josh Hunt
2012-02-11 15:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 16:22   ` Josh Hunt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3602A9.3060206@akamai.com \
    --to=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).