From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME v2 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:42:05 -0800 Message-ID: <4F41B2FD.9010705@zytor.com> References: <1329704570-3792-1-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:58240 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751733Ab2BTCmY (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:42:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1329704570-3792-1-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, hjl.tools@gmail.com, Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman On 02/19/2012 06:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > From: "H. Peter Anvin" > > This is a respin of the COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME bits of the x32 > patchset. It replaces patches 07/30-10/30 out of that patchset. > > The differences in this respin are: > > 1. Use helper functions as suggested by Linus, and > 2. Add support in the networking stack (this bit got inadvertently > left out of the previous patchset.) > > Linus, is this more what you were looking for? > > This is the diffstat for this set: > (And no, it doesn't even compile... working on that ;) -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.