From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Adjust the comment on get_order() to describe the size==0 case Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:22:07 -0800 Message-ID: <4F42B97F.6000808@zytor.com> References: <201112201509.21334.arnd@arndb.de> <20111213145654.14362.39868.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20111213145704.14362.62471.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <4EEF8652.5060201@zytor.com> <14925.1324395565@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:37539 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753944Ab2BTVWk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:22:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <14925.1324395565@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Howells Cc: Arnd Bergmann , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On 12/20/2011 07:39 AM, David Howells wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> I generally prefer asm-generic patches to go through the trees that are >> most interested in them (with my ack), which keeps the series close together >> and lets me not maintain a separate tree for asm-generic most of the time. > > Should I resubmit the latter two patches detached from the first with the > Acked-bys added? > > David [Resurrecting an old thread from before hpa 2.0] Yes please, I never received them... -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.