From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] asm-generic/unistd.h: handle symbol prefixes in cond_syscall Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:40:18 +0000 Message-ID: <4F47AF62.10507@imgtec.com> References: <4F47981F.4020305@imgtec.com> <201202241424.07319.arnd@arndb.de> <4F47A3F3.5030504@imgtec.com> <201202241509.41809.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from multi.imgtec.com ([194.200.65.239]:42872 "EHLO multi.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753695Ab2BXPkZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:40:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201202241509.41809.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel On 24/02/12 15:09, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 24 February 2012, James Hogan wrote: >> I've been looking at your initial comments for other architecture >> submissions and they've been very helpful, but if you do have any >> arch/metag specific suggestions I'd certainly welcome them. > > I've had only a brief look. In general I recommend doing whatever > openrisc does, they are currently the best implementation we have. Okay, thanks for the tip. > In order to get the code merged, you will need to move probing > of on-chip buses to device trees rather than hardcoding the > platform devices, that is probably the largest amount of work > that is still needed unless you've done that already in a later > version. Okay, this is something I've been looking at. > Do you have a git tree or patch with the latest source code? > the only copy I could find is a 2.6.37 kernel inside of a huge > tarball. Sorry, but unfortunately that's the latest released version of the kernel and I can't publish anything more recent at the moment. Thanks James