From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/30] x86-64: Use explicit sizes in sigcontext.h, prepare for x32 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:25:13 -0800 Message-ID: <4F559FB9.9040008@kernel.org> References: <1329696488-16970-1-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> <201202221222.58399.arnd@arndb.de> <4F453086.8030602@zytor.com> <201202222123.38816.arnd@arndb.de> <4F46F714.6010007@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:35940 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750814Ab2CFFZg (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:25:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F46F714.6010007@zytor.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com On 02/23/2012 06:33 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/22/2012 01:23 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> I'd say we should fix at least the ones that are easy to spot because >> they already use compat_u64 or have an #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 in compat >> code. I've looked at everything I could find that fits into that category >> and found only two locations. My expectation is that all other data >> structures that would fall into this category are already broken >> for 32 bit emulation on x86. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >> > > Would you mind sending these as patches to the respective maintainers? > Since they don't depend on the x32 patchset per se it's probably the > best way to handle this. > > Feel free to include my Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin . > Ping? -hpa